Hernandez Mejia v. Garland
| TERESA DE JESUS HERNANDEZ MEJIA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-63 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Petitioner Teresa De Jesus Hernandez Mejia. [Entered: 10/20/2023 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 20 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Petitioner Teresa De Jesus Hernandez Mejia. [COURT UPDATE: NAN, resent NDA to originating court] [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:25 PM] [Edited: 08/21/2023 10:20 AM] |
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. . [COURT UPDATE: resending NDA on originating court] [Entered: 06/24/2022 04:26 PM] [Edited: 08/21/2023 10:20 AM]
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Respondents motion to remand, filed May 27, 2022, has been referred to the mediation unit. If no response is filed by June 17, 2022, Respondents motion to remand will be granted and all other pending motions will be denied as moot. Either party may contact the mediator at Stephen_Liacouras@ca9.uscourts.gov to request an assessment conference, to discuss settlement of this matter or with other relevant questions. [Entered: 05/27/2022 04:34:00 PM]
|
| Filing 17 MOTION to remand case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/27/2022 06:28:00 AM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION to extend time to respond to Motion to Remand (DE 15) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/19/2022 07:52:00 AM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION to remand case filed by Petitioner Teresa De Jesus Hernandez Mejia. [Entered: 05/06/2022 03:39:00 PM] |
| Filing 14 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Teresa De Jesus Hernandez Mejia is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 04/18/2022 10:44:00 AM] |
| Filing 13 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Teresa De Jesus Hernandez Mejia. [Entered: 04/18/2022 10:42:00 AM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/08/2022 11:25:00 AM]
|
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/08/2022 09:50:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 FEE PAYMENT CORRESPONDENCE: Returned money order 4500586638 for $155.00 to Appellant as the fee for this appeal was previously satisfied. [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:28:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 Motion to Stay Removal filed at DE 8; Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due 4/20/2022. [Entered: 03/30/2022 04:46:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 03/30/2022 04:29:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 02/09/2022 12:34:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Joanna L. Watson for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/11/2022 08:38:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joanna L. Watson for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/11/2022 07:14:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 FEE PAID by Petitioner(s). (Receipt #4709005353)[Entered: 01/11/2022 06:49:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 2/14/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/15/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 6/14/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/10/2022 04:47:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 1/10/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-63 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/10/2022 04:45:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 01/10/2022 04:14:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Hernandez Mejia v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: TERESA DE JESUS HERNANDEZ MEJIA | |
| Represented By: | Teresa De Jesus Hernandez Mejia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Joanna L. Watson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
