Castillo Carrion v. Garland
Petitioner: ADELAIDO MARTIN CASTILLO CARRION
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-675
Filed: April 8, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2022 Filing 24 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 22 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received 11/14/2022. [Entered: 11/15/2022 11:13 AM]
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 22 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:35 PM]
November 7, 2022 Filing 22 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/07/2022 01:33 PM]
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 20) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 11/10/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 09/13/2022 10:24:00 AM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 20 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/12/2022 06:27:00 AM]
August 12, 2022 Filing 19 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Scott Michael Marconda representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/12/2022 03:31:00 PM]
August 12, 2022 Filing 18 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Spencer Shucard for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/12/2022 03:29:00 PM]
August 12, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Spencer Shucard for Merrick B. Garland replacing Scott Michael Marconda. [Entered: 08/12/2022 01:51:00 PM]
August 12, 2022 Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Adelaido Martin Castillo Carrion received. [Entered: 08/12/2022 01:30:00 PM]
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Adelaido Martin Castillo Carrion is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/09/2022 03:45:00 PM]
August 5, 2022 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Adelaido Martin Castillo Carrion. [Entered: 08/05/2022 03:47:00 PM]--[COURT UPDATE: attached PDF of addendum.] [Edited: 08/09/2022 03:43:00 PM]
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/11/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 10/11/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/13/2022 11:05:00 AM]
July 11, 2022 Filing 12 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Adelaido Martin Castillo Carrion. [Entered: 07/11/2022 12:11:00 PM]
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/23/2022 01:47:00 PM]
May 23, 2022 Filing 10 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/23/2022 01:32:00 PM]
May 13, 2022 Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 05/13/2022 08:36:00 AM]
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FILED. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 3) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The certified administrative record remains due May 13, 2022. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due June 3, 2022. The opening brief is due July 12, 2022. The answering brief is due September 12, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/18/2022 02:06:00 PM]
April 11, 2022 Filing 7 ADDED Scott Michael Marconda for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/11/2022 12:01:00 PM]
April 11, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Scott Michael Marconda for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/11/2022 06:24:00 AM]
April 8, 2022 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/13/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 6/3/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/12/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 9/12/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/08/2022 04:07:00 PM]
April 8, 2022 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/8/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-675 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/08/2022 04:06:00 PM]
April 8, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 04/08/2022 03:43:00 PM]
April 8, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/08/2022 03:42:00 PM]
April 8, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 04/08/2022 03:41:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Castillo Carrion v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ADELAIDO MARTIN CASTILLO CARRION
Represented By: Saman Nasseri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Spencer Shucard
Represented By: Mr. Scott Michael Marconda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?