Rodriguez-Castro v. Garland
| LISSETH NOHEMY RODRIGUEZ-CASTRO, ANDERSON ODAIR ALFARO-RODRIGUEZ and HEYSEL NOEMI MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-690 |
| April 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. Pursuant to respondents unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 19), the Clerk will close this courts docket for administrative purposes until further order of the court. This order is not a decision on the merits and has no impact on any stay of removal. No mandate will issue, and at any time any party may request that this immigration petition be reopened, or the court may reopen the petition sua sponte. Within 14 days after a determination at the agency level that petitioner is eligible for discretionary relief, the parties are expected to file a motion to remand. [Entered: 01/30/2023 03:28 PM]
|
| Filing 19 MOTION to administratively close case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/23/2023 12:17 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 17) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due April 17, 2023. The answering brief is due June 16, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/17/2023 05:15 PM]
|
| Filing 17 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Lisseth Nohemy Rodriguez-Castro, Petitioner Anderson Odair Alfaro-Rodriguez, Petitioner Heysel Noemi Martinez-Rodriguez. [Entered: 01/17/2023 04:11 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 15) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due January 17, 2023. The answering brief is due March 20, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 10/13/2022 03:12 PM]
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Lisseth Nohemy Rodriguez-Castro, Petitioner Anderson Odair Alfaro-Rodriguez, Petitioner Heysel Noemi Martinez-Rodriguez. [Entered: 10/12/2022 05:12 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 13) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 17, 2022. The answering brief is due December 16, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/18/2022 11:30:00 AM]
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Lisseth Nohemy Rodriguez-Castro, Petitioner Anderson Odair Alfaro-Rodriguez, Petitioner Heysel Noemi Martinez-Rodriguez. [Entered: 08/16/2022 04:35:00 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/17/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 10/17/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/15/2022 08:52:00 AM]
|
| Filing 11 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Anderson Odair Alfaro-Rodriguez, Petitioner Lisseth Nohemy Rodriguez-Castro, Petitioner Heysel Noemi Martinez-Rodriguez. [Entered: 07/14/2022 05:09:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 05/19/2022 07:38:00 AM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/11/2022 02:28:00 PM]
|
| Filing 8 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/11/2022 11:03:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 Motion to Stay Removal filed at DE 6; Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due 6/7/2022. [Entered: 04/12/2022 10:40:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/12/2022 10:27:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 ADDED Virginia Lum for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/12/2022 10:26:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Virginia Lum for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/12/2022 10:10:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/17/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/18/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 9/14/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/12/2022 09:20:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/11/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-690 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/12/2022 09:18:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 04/11/2022 06:06:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
