Kern River Boaters v. FERC
KERN RIVER BOATERS |
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION |
22-70075 |
April 15, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR REVIEW. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED RESPONDENTS OF FILING. SEND MQ: Yes. Petitioner Kern River Boaters Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/22/2022. Petitioner brief due 07/05/2022 for Kern River Boaters. Respondent brief due 08/03/2022 for Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Petitioner's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12422854] (WL) [Entered: 04/15/2022 02:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Kern River Boaters v. FERC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: KERN RIVER BOATERS | |
Represented By: | Brett Harding Duxbury Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION | |
Represented By: | Robert Harris Solomon Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.