David Betat v. USDOJ, et al
| DAVID H. BETAT, M.D. |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR |
| 22-70095 |
| May 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Attorneys Joshua H Packman and Sandra Stevens in 22-70095 substituted by Attorney Anita J. Gay in 22-70095 [12454464] (NAC) [Entered: 05/24/2022 06:46 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Anita Jane Gay (United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Narcotic & Dangerous Drug Section, 145 N St, NE, Suite 2E-404, Washington, DC 20002) for Respondents USDEA, Office of the Administrator, USDOJ and Petitioner David H. Betat, M.D.. Substitution for Joshua H Packman, Esquire for Respondents Office of the Administrator, USDEA and USDOJ and Sandra Stevens, Esquire for Respondents Office of the Administrator, USDEA and USDOJ. Date of service: 05/23/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12454432] [22-70095] (Gay, Anita) [Entered: 05/23/2022 07:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR REVIEW. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED RESPONDENTS OF FILING. SEND MQ: Yes. Petitioner David H. Betat Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/31/2022. Petitioner brief due 08/08/2022 for David H. Betat. Respondent brief due 09/07/2022 for Office of the Administrator, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and United States Department of Justice. Petitioner's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12453242] (BY) [Entered: 05/23/2022 07:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
