David Stebbins v. USDC-CAOAK
DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND |
In re: DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS, KARL POLANO, ALPHABET, INC., DISCORD, INC., FACEBOOK, INC., FREDERICK ALLISON, DBA InitiativeKookie, AMAZON.COM, INC., RAUL MATEAS, DBA TGP482 and YOUTUBE, LLC |
22-70132 |
June 28, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and DANIEL P. COLLINS)Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus or prohibition. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. Petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as moot. (COURT UPDATE: To reflect the correct order text; resend nda) [12492305] (WL) [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:55 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Mr. David Anthony Stebbins motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/28/2022. [12481757] (JMR) [Entered: 06/28/2022 10:58 AM] |
Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PETITIONER. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [12481739] (JMR) [Entered: 06/28/2022 10:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.