Nathan Hunter v. USDC-CAFR
| NATHAN HUNTER |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO |
| In re: NATHAN HUNTER, FISHER, Correctional Officer, CHI, Correctional Officer, THOMPSON, Correctional Officer, HERNANDEZ, Correctional Officer and J. CUI |
| 22-70241 |
| November 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RICHARD R. CLIFTON) The motion filed on October 31, 2022, is construed as a petition for a writ of mandamus. So construed, the petition is denied without prejudice to the filing of a new mandamus petition if the district court has not either (1) provided petitioner with another opportunity to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction or (2) ruled on petitioners motion for leave to file an amended complaint and defendants motion for summary judgment within 60 days of the date of this order. [12605910] (WL) [Entered: 12/08/2022 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [12578566] (BY) [Entered: 11/02/2022 10:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
