Michael Green v. USDC-CASF
MICHAEL GREEN |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO |
In re: MICHAEL GREEN and RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden |
22-70242 |
November 2, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RICHARD R. CLIFTON) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). A review of the record shows that appeal No. 22-16724 was opened on November 4, 2022. Accordingly, insofar as petitioner seeks mandamus relief, or any other relief, the petition is denied. Petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as moot. [12606156] (ABT) [Entered: 12/08/2022 04:53 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Michael Green motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/07/2022. [12584913] (DJV) [Entered: 11/10/2022 01:17 PM] |
Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [12579092] (BY) [Entered: 11/02/2022 04:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.