Polk v. Nevada Parole and Probation Division
| RENARD TRUMAN POLK |
| NEVADA DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETY, PAROLE AND PROB. DIV. |
| 22-715 |
| April 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MAIL RETURNED. Resending to: OIL [Entered: 03/22/2023 02:35 PM] |
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. The applicant has filed at Docket Entry No. 14, a petition for rehearing en banc. The applicant is informed that the courts January 23, 2023, order stated: No further filings will be entertained in this case. The court, therefore, will not take any action on the applicants filing. Any new claims in support of authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petition must be raised in a new application. The Clerk will send Form 12 to the applicant. [Entered: 02/24/2023 01:49 PM]
|
| Filing 15 MAIL RETURNED. Resending to: Casefiles-no forwarding address [Entered: 02/23/2023 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION to reconsider filed by Petitioner Renard Truman Polk. (NAN) [Entered: 02/06/2023 04:20 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. GRABER, PAEZ, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. We have reviewed the application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court, and the respondents response. The application is denied. The applicant has not made a prima facie showing under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2) that: (A) the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense. Any pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this case. DENIED. [Entered: 01/23/2023 04:30 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Response to Application for Leave to File Second or Successive 2254 Petition or 2255 Motion [Entered: 08/18/2022 04:05:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 DOCUMENT SENT. Public docket sheet sent to Renard Polk at the address listed on his request. [Entered: 08/03/2022 05:16:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION filed by Petitioner [Entered: 08/03/2022 03:00:00 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Respondents motion (Docket Entry No. 8) for an extension of time to file a response to the application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas petition is granted. The response is now due on August 24, 2022. The applicant may file a reply within 14 days after service of the response. [Entered: 06/22/2022 01:37:00 PM]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to extend time to respond to court order filed by Respondent Nevada Dept. of Pub. Safety, Parole and Prob. Div.. [Entered: 06/17/2022 11:49:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Charles L. Finlayson for Respondent Nevada Dept. of Pub. Safety, Parole and Prob. Div.. [Entered: 05/26/2022 02:15:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Charles L. Finlayson for Nevada Dept. of Pub. Safety, Parole and Prob. Div. replacing Heather D. Procter. [Entered: 05/26/2022 12:52:00 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court raises issues that warrant a response. See 9th Cir. R. 22-3(d). Within 35 days after the date of this order, respondent must file a response addressing whether the 2019 affidavit by a victim in this case warrants authorization to file a second or successive 2254 habeas corpus petition. The applicant may file a reply within 14 days after service of the response. The Clerk will add to the docket and serve an electronic copy of this order and the application filed at Docket Entry No. 1 on Heather D. Procter, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, 100 North Carson Street, Carson City, Nevada 89701. [Entered: 05/20/2022 03:35:00 PM] Updated docket text to show Judge names. [Edited: 06/22/2022 08:33:00 AM]
|
| Filing 4 ADDED Heather D. Procter for Respondent Nevada Dept. of Pub. Safety, Parole and Prob. Div.. [Entered: 05/20/2022 03:33:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 SOS DOCKETING NOTICE. Application for Permission to File a Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petition has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 22-715. All subsequent correspondence regarding this matter will be added to your file to be considered at the same time the cause is brought before the court. The case number and the title of your case should be shown in the upper right corner of any correspondence to the clerk's office, and should be directed to the above address pursuant to Circuit Rule 25-1. [Entered: 04/15/2022 03:15:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Application for Leave to File Second or Successive 2254 Petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/15/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-715 has been assigned to this case. [Entered: 04/15/2022 02:59:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to File 28 U.S.C. 2254 Second or Successive Petition. [Entered: 04/15/2022 02:38:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Polk v. Nevada Parole and Probation Division | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: RENARD TRUMAN POLK | |
| Represented By: | Renard Truman Polk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: NEVADA DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETY, PAROLE AND PROB. DIV. | |
| Represented By: | Charles L. Finlayson |
| Represented By: | Ms. Heather D. Procter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
