Vargas-Gaitan v. Garland
| SONIA ARELY VARGAS-GAITAN, RICARDO ESEQUIEL VELASQUEZ VARGAS, KATERIN TATIANA VELASQUEZ VARGAS and WALTHER ANTONIO VELASQUEZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-753 |
| April 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 45 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Sylvia L. Esparza. [Entered: 11/08/2023 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 44 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Las Vegas. Please review the Las Vegas sitting dates for March 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-753] [Entered: 11/06/2023 04:22 PM] |
Filing 43
ORDER FILED. The Motion to Reschedule Oral Argument Scheduled For October 5, 2023, filed on July 31, 2023, is GRANTED. [Entered: 08/10/2023 10:45 AM]
|
| Filing 42 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Reschedule Oral Argument (DE 41) filed by Petitioner Sonia Arely Vargas-Gaitan, Petitioner Ricardo Esequiel Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Katerin Tatiana Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Walther Antonio Velasquez. [Entered: 08/02/2023 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 41 MOTION to reschedule oral argument filed by Petitioner Sonia Arely Vargas-Gaitan, Petitioner Ricardo Esequiel Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Katerin Tatiana Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Walther Antonio Velasquez. [Entered: 07/31/2023 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 40 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Sylvia L. Esparza. [Entered: 07/25/2023 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 39 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Thursday, October 5, 2023 - 09:30 A.M. - Las Vegas Courtroom 7C - Scheduled Location: Las Vegas NV View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [22-753] [Entered: 07/24/2023 05:59 PM] |
| Filing 38 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, October 5, 2023 - 09:30 A.M. - Las Vegas Courtroom 7C - Scheduled Location: Las Vegas NV View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [22-753] [Entered: 07/24/2023 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 37 Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 35 by Petitioners received. [Entered: 07/10/2023 02:46 PM] |
|
Filing 36
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 35 by Petitioners is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/14/2023 02:26 PM]
|
| Filing 35 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Sonia Arely Vargas-Gaitan, Petitioner Ricardo Esequiel Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Katerin Tatiana Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Walther Antonio Velasquez. [Entered: 06/13/2023 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 34 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Las Vegas, Nevada. Please review the Las Vegas sitting dates for October 2-6, 2023 at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 06/06/2023 01:41 PM] |
|
Filing 33
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 32) for an extension of time to file the reply brief is granted. The reply brief is now due June 13, 2023. [Entered: 04/07/2023 03:27 PM]
|
| Filing 32 MOTION to extend time to to file reply brief filed by Petitioner Sonia Arely Vargas-Gaitan, Petitioner Ricardo Esequiel Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Katerin Tatiana Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Walther Antonio Velasquez. [Entered: 04/06/2023 04:35 PM] |
|
Filing 31
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days (DE 30) granted. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days (DE 30) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 04/14/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/10/2023 12:54 PM]
|
| Filing 30 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file reply brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Sonia Arely Vargas-Gaitan, Petitioner Ricardo Esequiel Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Katerin Tatiana Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Walther Antonio Velasquez. [Entered: 03/10/2023 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 29 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 27 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 02/27/2023 04:16 PM] |
|
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 27 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 02/23/2023 11:15 AM]
|
| Filing 27 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/22/2023 10:42 AM] |
|
Filing 26
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 25) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due February 22, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/18/2023 03:49 PM]
|
| Filing 25 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/17/2023 03:25 PM] |
|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 23) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 1/23/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/16/2022 09:26 AM]
|
| Filing 23 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/15/2022 11:02 PM] |
| Filing 22 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Dana Michelle Camilleri representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/07/2022 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 21 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Matthew B. George for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/07/2022 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matthew B. George for Merrick B. Garland replacing Dana Michelle Camilleri. [Entered: 11/06/2022 05:41 PM] |
| Filing 19 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 17 by Petitioners received. [Entered: 10/26/2022 01:40 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 17 by Petitioners is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/25/2022 09:08 AM]
|
| Filing 17 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Sonia Arely Vargas-Gaitan, Petitioner Ricardo Esequiel Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Katerin Tatiana Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Walther Antonio Velasquez. [Entered: 10/24/2022 03:00 PM] [Edited: 10/25/2022 09:05 AM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 15) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 24, 2022. The answering brief is due December 23, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/22/2022 11:33:00 AM]
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Sonia Arely Vargas-Gaitan, Petitioner Ricardo Esequiel Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Katerin Tatiana Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Walther Antonio Velasquez. [Entered: 08/18/2022 03:47:00 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/25/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 10/24/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/25/2022 01:02:00 PM]
|
| Filing 13 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Katerin Tatiana Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Ricardo Esequiel Velasquez Vargas, Petitioner Sonia Arely Vargas-Gaitan, Petitioner Walther Antonio Velasquez. [Entered: 07/22/2022 08:48:00 AM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 06/15/2022 09:47:00 AM]
|
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/15/2022 06:25:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 05/31/2022 09:57:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 Fee Paid by Katerin Tatiana Velasquez Vargas, Ricardo Esequiel Velasquez Vargas, Sonia Arely Vargas-Gaitan, Walther Antonio Velasquez. Fee Receipt Number: A09-2601700-ACMS. [Entered: 05/05/2022 10:16:00 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 04/27/2022 11:52:00 AM]
|
| Filing 7 ADDED Dana Michelle Camilleri for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/27/2022 09:04:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Dana Michelle Camilleri for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/27/2022 07:38:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/27/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 6/17/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/26/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 9/26/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:39:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/22/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-753 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:36:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 3/24/2022. [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:07:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:06:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:06:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
