Gill v. Garland
| PIARA SINGH GILL |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-783 |
| April 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 MANDATE ISSUED Mary M. SCHROEDER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY [Entered: 06/16/2023 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 29 MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Mary M. SCHROEDER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY) PETITION DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 04/24/2023 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 28 SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS to Mary M. SCHROEDER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY. [Entered: 04/20/2023 02:18 PM] |
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. The court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal argument are adequately presented in the briefs and record, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. This matter is ordered submitted on the briefs and record without oral argu-ment on April 20, 2023, in San Francisco, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). [Entered: 03/15/2023 10:39 AM]
|
| Filing 26 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Anas Jameel Ahmed for Petitioner Piara Singh Gill. [Entered: 02/28/2023 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 25 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Victoria M. Braga for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/07/2023 05:27 AM] |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Thursday, April 20, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 02/06/2023 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 23 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco, CA. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for April 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motoin within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 12/14/2022 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Victoria M. Braga. [Entered: 11/21/2022 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Anas Jameel Ahmed. [Entered: 11/21/2022 08:06 AM] |
| Filing 20 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Daniel Smulow representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/18/2022 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 19 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Victoria M. Braga for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/18/2022 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Victoria M. Braga for Merrick B. Garland replacing Daniel Smulow. [Entered: 11/18/2022 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco, CA. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for March 6-10 and March 27-31, 2023 at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 11/18/2022 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 14 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 09/23/2022 04:17:00 PM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 14 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/19/2022 01:04:00 PM]
|
| Filing 14 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/19/2022 12:05:00 PM] |
| Filing 13 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 by Petitioner Piara Singh Gill received. [Entered: 08/02/2022 03:06:16 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 by Petitioner Piara Singh Gill is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/01/2022 03:13:48 PM]
|
| Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Piara Singh Gill. [Entered: 08/01/2022 01:42:16 PM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Update: court received electronic submission of one DVD on 5/26/22] [Entered: 05/26/2022 06:13:00 AM] [Edited: 08/03/2022 11:35:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 TERMINATED participation of Gregory Michael Kelch representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/05/2022 10:57:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Daniel Smulow for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/05/2022 10:56:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Smulow for Merrick B. Garland replacing Gregory Michael Kelch. [Entered: 05/04/2022 06:27:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Gregory Michael Kelch for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/28/2022 12:01:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gregory Michael Kelch for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/28/2022 11:14:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/2/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/1/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 9/30/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/28/2022 10:18:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/28/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-783 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/28/2022 10:13:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 4/19/2022. [Entered: 04/28/2022 09:45:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 04/28/2022 09:45:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gill v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: PIARA SINGH GILL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Anas Jameel Ahmed |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Victoria M. Braga |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Daniel Smulow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
