In re: Igor Lukashin
| In re: IGOR LUKASHIN |
| 22-80034 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 38 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Correspondence: Copy of CORRECTED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI UNTIL DECEMBER 16, 2022. Date of service: 10/11/2022 [12560402] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 10/11/2022 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 37 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Correspondence: Copy of a REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI UNTIL DECEMBER 16, 2022. Date of service: 10/11/2022 [12559873] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 10/11/2022 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 36 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Correspondence: Rule 36-4 publication request, No. 21-55504, Sundby v. Marquee Funding Group. Date of service: 10/07/2022 [12558312] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 10/07/2022 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 35 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Correspondence: Rule 36-4 publication request, No. 21-35781, Collins v. West. Date of service: 09/30/2022 [12553942] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 09/30/2022 06:31 PM] |
| Filing 34 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): This court has reviewed respondents submission captioned for appeal No. 21-56138 (Docket Entry No. [ # 25 ]), pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in this docket on May 24, 2022. Respondent is not a party in appeal No. 21-56138. At the direction of the panel, the court denies permission to proceed. The submission will not be docketed in appeal No. 21-56138, and the court will take no further action on the submission. No motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. [12552353] (WL) [Entered: 09/29/2022 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 33 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): This court has reviewed respondents submission captioned for appeal No. 21-16059 (Docket Entry No. [ # 24 ]), pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in this docket on May 24, 2022. Respondent is not a party in appeal No. 21-16059. At the direction of the panel, the court denies permission to proceed. The submission will not be docketed in appeal No. 21-16059, and the court will take no further action on the submission. No motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. [12548148] (WL) [Entered: 09/23/2022 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 32 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): This court has reviewed respondents submissions captioned for appeal No. 21-60037 (Docket Entry No. [ # 17 ]) and appeal No. 22-15172 (Docket Entry No. [ # 18 ]), pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in this docket on May 24, 2022. Respondent is not a party in appeal No. 21-60037 or No. 22-15172. At the direction of the panel, the court denies permission to proceed. The submissions will not be docketed in appeal Nos. 21-60037 or 22-15172, and the court will take no further action on the submissions. No motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. [12548145] (WL) [Entered: 09/23/2022 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 31 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Correspondence: Circuit Rule 36-4 publication request, No. 21-55502, Bryant v. City of Pomona. Date of service: 09/21/2022 [12545644] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 09/21/2022 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 30 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Correspondence: Rule 36-4 publication request, No. 21-16434, Nelson v. AZ Dept. of Econ. Security. Date of service: 09/20/2022 [12545188] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 09/20/2022 08:29 PM] |
| Filing 29 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Correspondence: Rule 36-4 publication request, No. 21-55783, Dodson v. County of Los Angeles. Date of service: 08/29/2022 [12529061] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 08/29/2022 06:25 PM] |
| Filing 28 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin motion for reconsideration of dispositive Clerk Order of 08/12/2022. Date of service: 08/24/2022. [12525344] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 08/24/2022 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 27 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Correspondence: Circuit Rule 36-4 publication request, No. 21-35555, Garcia v. Coast Comty. Health Ctr.. Date of service: 08/13/2022 [12516438] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 08/13/2022 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 26 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): This court has reviewed respondents submissions captioned for appeal No. 19-36094 (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 9 ] and [ # 23 ]), pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in this docket on May 24, 2022. Respondent is not a party in appeal No. 19-36094. The court denies permission to proceed. The submissions will not be docketed in appeal No. 19-36094, and the court will take no further action on the submissions. No motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. [12516297] (WL) [Entered: 08/12/2022 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 25 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Correspondence: Circuit Rule 36-4 request for publication, Sperring v. LLR, LLC, No. 21-56138. Date of service: 08/11/2022 [12515500] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 08/11/2022 05:49 PM] |
| Filing 24 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Correspondence: Circuit Rule 36-4 publication request, No. 21-16059, Morris v. State of California. Date of service: 07/26/2022 [12502964] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 07/26/2022 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 23 Filed Respondent Igor Lukashin's Emergency motion to expedite ruling on publication request. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/21/2022. [12501228] (HH) [Entered: 07/25/2022 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 22 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): This court has reviewed respondents submissions captioned for appeal No. 20-16605 (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 10 ], [ # 14 ], [ # 16 ], [ # 19 ] and [ # 20 ]), pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in this docket on May 24, 2022. Respondent is not a party in appeal No. 20-16605. The court denies permission to proceed. The submissions will not be docketed in appeal No. 20-16605, and the court will take no further action on the submissions. No motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. [12498180] (WL) [Entered: 07/20/2022 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 21 Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and RYAN D. NELSON) Respondent has filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc of the courts May 24, 2022 order. The motion is treated as a motion for reconsideration and motion for reconsideration en banc. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. The motion for reconsideration is denied and the motion for reconsideration en banc (Docket Entry No. [ # 15 ]) is denied on behalf of the court. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10; 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.11. No further motions for reconsideration of the courts May 24, 2022 order will be considered. [12497098] (WL) [Entered: 07/19/2022 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 20 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin petition for rehearing en banc (from 07/01/2022 opinion). Date of service: 07/14/2022. [12494345] --[COURT ENTERED FILING. Originally filed in case 20-16605.] (TYL) [Entered: 07/14/2022 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 19 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin petition for rehearing en banc (from 07/01/2022 opinion). Date of service: 07/11/2022. [12491467] --[COURT ENTERED FILING. Originally filed in case 20-16605.] (TYL) [Entered: 07/12/2022 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 18 Filed Respondent Igor Lukashin letter dated 06/30/2021 re: Requesting publication of memorandum filed in 22-15172. [12484735] (HH) [Entered: 07/01/2022 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 17 Filed Respondent Igor Lukashin letter dated 06/27/2022 re: Requesting publication of memorandum filed in 21-60037. [12482488] (HH) [Entered: 06/28/2022 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 16 Filed Respondent Igor Lukashin additional citations. Served on 06/23/2022. (Motions) [12478283] (HH) [Entered: 06/23/2022 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 15 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc (from 05/24/2022 memorandum). Date of service: 06/21/2022. [12476377] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 06/21/2022 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 14 Filed Respondent Igor Lukashin's Eighteenth FRAP 28(j) Letter. [12473218] (HH) [Entered: 06/16/2022 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and RYAN D. NELSON): Respondents motion for an extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration and reconsideration en banc of the courts May 24, 2022 order (Docket Entry No. [ # 11 ]) is granted in part. Respondents motion for a 14-day extension of time is granted. Any motion for reconsideration and reconsideration en banc of the courts May 24, 2022 order is due June 21, 2022. Respondents alternative motion for an extension of time until after the court resolves Docket Entry Nos. [ # 9 ] and [ # 10 ] is denied. No further motions for an extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration of the courts May 24, 2022 order will be considered. [12465813] (AF) [Entered: 06/07/2022 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 12 Deleted Incorrect Entry (Entered in Wrong Case0. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Original Text: Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court,, filed 5/30/2022. [12465134] (HH) [Entered: 06/07/2022 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Motion to extend time to file petition for rehearing until 06/21/2022. Date of service: 06/06/2022. [12464826] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 06/06/2022 05:30 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Respondent Igor Lukashin additional citations. Served on 06/06/2022. (Prose) [12463946] (DJV) [Entered: 06/06/2022 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Respondent Igor Lukashin motion to request publication of memorandum decision. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/25/2022. [12456678] (QDL) [Entered: 05/25/2022 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and RYAN D. NELSON) Respondents motion for judicial notice as to the documents in the appendix to the motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is granted. The motion for judicial notice is otherwise denied. Respondents request for court statistics is denied. Respondents motion for panel recusal and for out-of-circuit assignment (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) is denied. Upon review of the response to the April 22, 2022 order to show cause, we conclude that entry of the following pre-filing review order is warranted. Respondents filings in this court are restricted as follows..... (4) This pre-filing review order will remain in effect until further order of this court. Respondent may, no earlier than June 1, 2024, petition the court to lift this pre-filing review order. (5) If respondent fails to comply with this order, respondents submissions in matters in which he is not a party will be summarily stricken, and respondent may be subject to sanctions. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [12454903] (WL) [Entered: 05/24/2022 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin response to Court order dated 04/22/2022. Date of service: 05/06/2022. [12440051] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 05/06/2022 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion for panel recusal and out-of-circuit reassignment. See Caryn Strickland v. US, No. 21-1346 (4th Cir. Apr. 26, 2022); Glick v. Edwards, 803 F.3d 505, 509 & n. 2 (9th Cir. 2015); Williams v. Pennsylvania, 136 S. Ct. 1899, 1905-06, 1909 (2016)]. Date of service: 04/30/2022. [12435325] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 04/30/2022 06:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin Motion to take judicial notice of copies of Circuit Rule 36-4 letters in Ninth Circuit Cases where the Court granted publication requests, including by non-parties; that only 5 requests have been granted since 2019; other facts listed on pp. 3-4; and request discovery of statistics, p. 5. Date of service: 04/28/2022. [12433758] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 04/28/2022 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and PAUL J. WATFORD)Respondents motion for clarification (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is denied. Respondents request for a stay of the courts April 22, 2022 order is denied. Respondents request for oral argument is denied. The response to the courts April 22, 2022 order remains due May 6, 2022. [12432749] (WL) [Entered: 04/27/2022 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Respondent Igor Lukashin motion for reconsideration of non-dispositive Clerk Order of 04/22/2022. Date of service: 04/25/2022. [12430306] [22-80034] (Lukashin, Igor) [Entered: 04/25/2022 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and PAUL J. WATFORD) This courts records reflect that, since 2019, respondent Igor Lukashin has filed over 25 repetitive motions to intervene and requests to publish pursuant to Circuit Rule 36-4 in cases in which he is not a party. Respondents practice of burdening this court with repetitive and meritless motions and submissions in matters in which he is not a party justifies careful oversight of respondents future non-party filings in this court. The Supreme Court has recognized that every paper filed with the Clerk of this Court, no matter how repetitious or frivolous, requires some portion of the institutions limited resources. A part of the [c]ourts responsibility is to see that these resources are allocated in a way that promotes the interests of justice. The continual processing of the [appellants] frivolous requests . . . does not promote that end. In re McDonald, 489 U.S. 180, 184 (1989). This court faces the same problems of limited resources in handling its large volume of appellate litigation. Respondent Lukashin must show cause within 14 days after the date of this order why this court should not enter the following pre-filing review order governing respondents non-party filings. See Visser v. California, 919 F.2d 113, 114 (9th Cir. 1990) (This court has the inherent power to restrict a litigants ability to commence abusive litigation); see also Wolfe v. George, 486 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2007) (finding no constitutional right to file frivolous litigation, upholding California vexatious litigant statute). If respondent fails to file a timely response to this order, the Clerk will enter the pre-filing review order..... (5) If respondent fails to comply with this order, respondents submissions in matters in which he is not a party will be summarily stricken, and respondent may be subject to sanctions. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [12428631] (WL) [Entered: 04/22/2022 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 Miscellaneous case docketed. [12427581] (BY) [Entered: 04/21/2022 11:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Igor Lukashin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: In re: IGOR LUKASHIN | |
| Represented By: | Igor Lukashin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
