Lamya Brewster, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
| LAMYA BREWSTER, individually and as class representative, ELIAS ARIZMENDI, individually and as class representatives and JULIAN VIGIL, individually and as class representatives |
| CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, CHARLIE BECK, Chief, individually, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, a public entity, CHARLIE BECK, Chief, in his official capacity and DOES 1 THROUGH 10 |
| 22-80079 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 FILED ON 08/10/2022 PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 23(f). SERVED ON 08/10/2022. [12515469] (BY) [Entered: 08/11/2022 04:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
