In re: Douglas Davies
| In re: DOUGLAS LOWELL DAVIES, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 18, 2003 |
| 22-80085 |
| August 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): The Court has been informed that Douglas L. Davies has been transferred to disability inactive status by the Washington State Bar. Within 28 days of this order, respondent must either agree to a reciprocal suspension or show cause why such a suspension should not be imposed. See Fed. R. App. P. 46(b); 9th Cir. R. 46-2. If the court does not receive a timely response to this order, respondent will be removed from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice in this court without further notice. [12521776] (JMR) [Entered: 08/19/2022 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 Attorney discipline case docketed. [12520189] (BY) [Entered: 08/18/2022 02:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Douglas Davies | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: In re: DOUGLAS LOWELL DAVIES, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 18, 2003 | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Lowell Davies Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
