Sara DeRosa v. Paramount Global, et al
| PARAMOUNT GLOBAL, FKA ViacomCBS Inc., CBS TELEVISION STUDIOS, A Division of CBS Studios, Inc., SESSIONS PAYROLL MANAGEMENT INC., GAIL LEVINE, GREGG LEVINE, FIRSTHAND PRODUCTIONS, INC., EAST END PRODUCTIONS, INC., SNAPSHOT PRODUCTIONS, INC., BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE AFTRA RETIREMENT FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SAG PRODUCERS PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SAG-AFTRA HEALTH PLAN and DOES 1 - 50 |
| SARA DEROSA, Individually, and On Behalf of others similarly situated |
| 22-80121 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Petitioner Sessions Payroll Management Inc. Correspondence: Joinder by Petitioner-Defendant SESSIONS PAYROLL to Petition by Petitioner-Defendant PARAMOUNT for Permission to Appeal Under Rule 23(f). Date of service: 10/26/2022 [12573030] [22-80121] (Anderton, Daniel) [Entered: 10/26/2022 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Petitioners' notice of intent to unseal previously sealed material. Material: other (Petition for Permission to Appeal Under Rule 23(f)). Date of service: 10/25/2022. [12573032]--[Edited: backdated entry to correct file date. 10/26/2022 by LA] (LA) [Entered: 10/26/2022 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED UNDER SEAL ON 10/25/2022 PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 23(f). SERVED ON 10/25/2022. [12572951]--[Edited to note under seal. 10/26/2022 by LA] (BY) [Entered: 10/26/2022 07:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
