Ortiz-Bonilla v. Garland
| MARITZA MAGDALENA ORTIZ-BONILLA and HEISY YAMILETH HERNANDEZ-ORTIZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-892 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 MANDATE ISSUED Sidney R. THOMAS, Lucy H. KOH, Jed S. Rakoff [Entered: 06/12/2023 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 27 MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Sidney R. THOMAS, Lucy H. KOH, Jed S. Rakoff) PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 04/18/2023 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 26 SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS to Sidney R. THOMAS, Lucy H. KOH, Jed S. Rakoff. [Entered: 04/13/2023 11:38 AM] |
Filing 25
ORDER FILED. The court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal argument are adequately presented in the briefs and record, and that the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, this matter is ordered submitted on the briefs and record without oral argument on April 13, 2023, in San Francisco, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). [Entered: 03/29/2023 10:34 AM]
|
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Thursday, April 13, 2023 - 10:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice [Updated: Start Time] [Entered: 03/28/2023 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 23 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by John D. Williams for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/23/2023 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Thomas Damien Pamilla for Petitioner Maritza Magdalena Ortiz-Bonilla, Petitioner Heisy Yamileth Hernandez-Ortiz. [Entered: 02/28/2023 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Thursday, April 13, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 02/22/2023 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 20 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 18 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 02/13/2023 03:41 PM] |
|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 18 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 02/09/2023 10:44 AM]
|
| Filing 18 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/09/2023 10:14 AM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 16) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due February 17, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 11/29/2022 09:46 AM]
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/23/2022 06:01 AM] |
| Filing 15 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Elizabeth Robyn Chapman representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/22/2022 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 14 ADDED Counsel for Respondent John D. Williams for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/22/2022 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John D. Williams for Merrick B. Garland replacing Elizabeth Robyn Chapman. [Entered: 11/21/2022 09:02 AM] [Edited: 11/21/2022 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 12 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Petitioners Maritza Magdalena Ortiz-Bonilla and Heisy Yamileth Hernandez-Ortiz received. [Entered: 10/27/2022 01:54 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Petitioners Maritza Magdalena Ortiz-Bonilla and Heisy Yamileth Hernandez-Ortiz is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/20/2022 04:16 PM]
|
| Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Maritza Magdalena Ortiz-Bonilla, Petitioner Heisy Yamileth Hernandez-Ortiz. [Entered: 10/19/2022 07:01 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 1) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 19, 2022. The answering brief is due December 19, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/22/2022 02:27:00 PM]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Maritza Magdalena Ortiz-Bonilla, Petitioner Heisy Yamileth Hernandez-Ortiz. [Entered: 08/19/2022 12:44:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 06/24/2022 06:36:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Elizabeth Robyn Chapman for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/17/2022 05:03:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Elizabeth Robyn Chapman for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/17/2022 04:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/21/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/22/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 10/19/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/17/2022 11:15:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/17/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-892 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/17/2022 11:12:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 4/27/2022. [Entered: 05/17/2022 11:00:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/17/2022 10:59:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
