Schwiger v. Olsen
| LAWRENCE SCHWIGER |
| KYLE OLSEN, WARDEN |
| 22-903 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The applicant has filed at Docket Entry No. 10 a motion for an extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration. The applicant is informed that the courts August 23, 2022, order stated: No further filings will be entertained in this case. The court, therefore, will not take any action on the applicants filing. [Entered: 09/14/2022 11:04:00 AM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to extend time to file motion to reconsider filed by Petitioner Lawrence Schwiger. [Entered: 08/31/2022 03:05:00 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Sidney R. THOMAS, Richard A. PAEZ, Kenneth K. LEE The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court, as supplemented by Docket Entry No. 2, is denied. The applicant has not made a prima facie showing under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2) that: (A) the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense. The application was provisionally sealed because it contains confidential information that should have been redacted prior to filing. The Clerk will maintain the application and supplement at Docket Entry Nos. 1 and 2, under seal in accordance with Ninth Circuit Rule 27-13. Any pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this case. DENIED. [Entered: 08/23/2022 11:33:00 AM]
|
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Petitioner a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request filed on 08-15-2022. [Entered: 08/18/2022 10:59:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION filed by Petitioner Lawrence Schwiger. [Entered: 08/15/2022 04:38:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 CORRESPONDENCE Sent Appellant a copy of all filings for this appeal in paper format as well as the following documents from previous appeals in response to the letter filed on 07/08/2022. Docket number 13-15564 , docket entry numbers 6,12,13,18,20,23,31-33,35,37-39,41-43 and 46. Docket number 11-16790, docket entry numbers 2-5 and in docket number 09-17079, docket entry numbers 3-6. . [Entered: 07/13/2022 11:55:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Petitioner Lawrence Schwiger. [Entered: 07/11/2022 11:47:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 SOS DOCKETING NOTICE. Application for Permission to File a Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petition has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 22-903. All subsequent correspondence regarding this matter will be added to your file to be considered at the same time the cause is brought before the court. The case number and the title of your case should be shown in the upper right corner of any correspondence to the clerk's office, and should be directed to the above address pursuant to Circuit Rule 25-1. [Entered: 05/19/2022 11:49:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Application for Leave to File Second or Successive 2254 Petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/19/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-903 has been assigned to this case. [Entered: 05/19/2022 11:47:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 Exhibit to 2254 Petition. [Entered: 05/19/2022 11:22:00 AM] Sealed PDF. [Edited: 08/15/2022 08:55:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to File 28 U.S.C. 2254 Second or Successive Petition. [Entered: 05/19/2022 11:22:00 AM] Sealed PDF. [Edited: 08/15/2022 08:54:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Schwiger v. Olsen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: LAWRENCE SCHWIGER | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence Schwiger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: KYLE OLSEN, WARDEN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
