Garcia Rangel v. Garland
| JOSE BONIFACIO GARCIA RANGEL |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-943 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 MANDATE ISSUED A. Wallace TASHIMA, Sidney R. THOMAS, Lucy H. KOH [Entered: 05/22/2023 10:23 AM] |
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. A. Wallace TASHIMA, Sidney R. THOMAS, Lucy H. KOH There is no longer a final order of removal that this court has jurisdiction to review because petitioners removal proceedings were reopened by the agency on November 16, 2022. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(1); Lopez-Ruiz v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 886, 887 (9th Cir. 2002). The governments motion to dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction (Docket Entry No. 20) is granted. The temporary stay of removal is lifted. Petitioners motion for an abeyance (Docket Entry No. 19) is denied as moot. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/30/2023 09:51 AM]
|
| Filing 21 RESPONSE to Motion to Hold in Abeyance (DE 19) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/29/2022 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/29/2022 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION to hold case in abeyance filed by Petitioner Jose Bonifacio Garcia Rangel. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 18.] [Entered: 12/21/2022 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE --- STATUS REPORT (as required by Court order) filed by Petitioner Jose Bonifacio Garcia Rangel. [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 19.] [Entered: 12/21/2022 10:02 AM] [Edited: 12/21/2022 10:27 AM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. The court received petitioners status report at Docket Entry No. 16. Within 21 days after this order, petitioner must file a motion for voluntary dismissal, or a motion requesting other appropriate relief. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this case. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/30/2022 03:02 PM]
|
| Filing 16 STATUS REPORT (as required by Court order) filed by Petitioner Jose Bonifacio Garcia Rangel. [Entered: 11/22/2022 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 15 STATUS REPORT (as required by Court order) filed by Petitioner Jose Bonifacio Garcia Rangel. [Entered: 11/07/2022 04:12 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 13) to stay appellate proceedings is granted. The previously established briefing schedule is vacated. Appellate proceedings are stayed until resolution of petitioners motion to reopen with the Board of Immigration Appeals or until further order of this court. Petitioner shall file a status report on November 7, 2022 and every 90 days thereafter while petitioners motion to reopen is pending. Status reports should include: any change in the status of petitioners motion to reopen; and the estimated date of resolution of petitioners motion to reopen, if known. Petitioner shall notify the court by filing a status report within 7 days of the resolution of petitioners motion to reopen. Failure to file a status report will terminate the stay of appellate proceedings. The briefing schedule will be reset in a future order. [Entered: 08/16/2022 02:02:00 PM]
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to hold case in abeyance filed by Petitioner Jose Bonifacio Garcia Rangel. [Entered: 08/08/2022 02:18:00 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 07/07/2022 09:26:00 AM]
|
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/07/2022 05:28:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 07/05/2022 08:01:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 Fee Paid by Jose Bonifacio Garcia Rangel. Fee Receipt Number: A09-2601838-ACMS. [Entered: 06/14/2022 10:32:00 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 06/09/2022 03:49:00 PM]
|
| Filing 7 ADDED Giovanni Di Maggio for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/31/2022 08:47:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Giovanni Di Maggio for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/31/2022 04:58:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 7/1/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 7/22/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/30/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 10/31/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/27/2022 10:52:00 AM] [Edited: 05/27/2022 10:57:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/27/2022 10:49:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/26/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-943 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/27/2022 10:47:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 4/27/2022. [Entered: 05/26/2022 10:04:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/26/2022 10:03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Garcia Rangel v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSE BONIFACIO GARCIA RANGEL | |
| Represented By: | Katarina Rost |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Giovanni Di Maggio |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
