Espinoza-Urbina v. Garland
Petitioner: LEE ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA-URBINA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-946
Filed: May 27, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER FILED. Pursuant to the parties' Notice of Settlement of EAJA Fees and Joint Motion for Court Order (Docket Entry No. 43), petitioner is awarded $5,544.82 in attorneys' fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. section 2412(d)(1)(A). The court will take no further action on petitioners motion for EAJA fees (Docket Entry No. 37). [Entered: 10/26/2023 10:22 AM]
October 23, 2023 Filing 43 RESPONSE to Motion for Attorneys Fees (DE 37) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/23/2023 01:47 PM]
October 4, 2023 Filing 42 MEDIATION ORDER: Counsel shall provide a status report by email to the Circuit Mediator (Steven_Saltiel@ca9.uscourts.gov), copied to all counsel, by November 3, 2023. Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. The status report should not be filed with the court. [Entered: 10/04/2023 01:04 PM]
September 8, 2023 Filing 41 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Counsel shall provide a status report by email to the Circuit Mediator (Steven_Saltiel@ca9.uscourts.gov), copied to all counsel, by October 5, 2023. Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. The status report should not be filed with the court. [Entered: 09/08/2023 10:04 AM]
August 9, 2023 Filing 40 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call w/ 20-71310, 9/5/2023, 10:00 am Pacific Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 08/09/2023 02:44 PM]
July 27, 2023 Filing 39 MEDIATION ORDER FILED (text only). Respondent's response to petitioner's motion for attorney's fees is stayed pending mediation. [Entered: 07/27/2023 01:33 PM]
July 26, 2023 Filing 38 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference w/ 20-71310, 8/9/2023, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 07/26/2023 09:16 AM]
July 20, 2023 Filing 37 MOTION for attorneys fees filed by Petitioner Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina. [Entered: 07/20/2023 12:27 PM]
April 25, 2023 Filing 36 Paper copies (7) of Opening Brief in Nos. 20-71310 and 22-946 submitted at DE 23 by Petitioner Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina received 04/24/2023. [Entered: 04/25/2023 11:04 AM]
March 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion to remand this matter to the Board of Immigration Appeals (Docket Entry No. 34) is granted. Petitioners removal is stayed pending a Board decision in this matter. This order served on the agency shall act as the mandate of this court. REMANDED. [Entered: 03/22/2023 04:33 PM]
March 15, 2023 Filing 34 MOTION to remand case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/15/2023 02:13 PM]
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER FILED. A review of Court records reflects that petitioner Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina has not filed paper copies of the opening brief as directed by the Courts order filed on December 15, 2022. Petitioner is ordered to file 6 copies of the opening brief in paper format with blue covers, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically, for delivery to the Court within 7 days of this order. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [Entered: 03/09/2023 08:43 AM]
February 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 31) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 3/15/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/08/2023 10:49 AM]
February 6, 2023 Filing 31 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/06/2023 07:18 AM]
January 27, 2023 Filing 30 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Imran Raza Zaidi representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/27/2023 10:50 AM]
January 27, 2023 Filing 29 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Lindsay Brooke Glauner for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/27/2023 10:48 AM]
January 27, 2023 Filing 28 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lindsay Brooke Glauner for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Imran Raza Zaidi. [Entered: 01/27/2023 07:31 AM]
December 21, 2022 Filing 27 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Imran Raza Zaidi for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/21/2022 12:24 PM]
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief in Nos. 20-71310 and 22-946 submitted at DE 23 by Petitioner Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 12/15/2022 11:43 AM]
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion to file a late opening brief (Docket Entry No. 41 in No. 20-71310; Docket Entry No. 24 in No. 22-946) is granted. The Clerk will file the opening brief for No. 22-946 (submitted at Docket Entry No. 40 in No. 20-71310; Docket Entry No. 23 in No. 22-946). The answering brief for No. 22-946 is now due February 13, 2023. The optional reply brief for No. 22-946 is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 12/14/2022 09:26 AM]
December 12, 2022 Filing 24 MOTION to accept late filing filed by Petitioner Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina. [Entered: 12/12/2022 10:27 AM]
December 12, 2022 Filing 23 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina. [Entered: 12/12/2022 09:55 AM]
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 38 in No. 20-71310; Docket Entry No. 21 in No. 22-946) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. Briefing is complete in No. 20-71310. The opening brief in No. 22-946 is due December 7, 2022. The answering brief is due February 6, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 12/05/2022 09:19 AM]
November 30, 2022 Filing 21 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina. [Entered: 11/30/2022 12:07 PM]
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion to consolidate (Docket Entry No. 36 in No. 20-71310; Docket Entry No. 18 in No. 22-946) is granted. Nos. 20-71310 and 22-946 are consolidated. The parties must include both case numbers on all future filings. Briefing is complete in No. 20-71310. In No. 22-946, petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 19) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief in No. 22-946 is now due November 30, 2022. The answering brief is due January 30, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Although these consolidated cases were opened in different systems (No. 20-71310 in CM/ECF and No. 22-946 in ACMS), electronic filers are expected to submit future filings in ACMS only, under No. 22-946. The court will then replicate the ACMS docket entries in CM/ECF, under No. 20-71310. [Entered: 10/27/2022 09:22 AM]
October 26, 2022 Filing 19 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina. [Entered: 10/26/2022 09:18 AM]
October 26, 2022 Filing 18 MOTION to consolidate filed by Petitioner Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina. [Entered: 10/26/2022 07:47 AM]
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 16) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 31, 2022. The answering brief is due December 30, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 09/30/2022 10:34:00 AM]
September 29, 2022 Filing 16 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina. [Entered: 09/29/2022 11:33:00 AM]
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/26/2022 11:33:00 AM]
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 9/29/2022, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 11/28/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 08/31/2022 02:30:00 PM]
August 30, 2022 Filing 13 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina. [Entered: 08/30/2022 08:17:00 PM]
August 25, 2022 Filing 12 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/25/2022 07:30:00 AM]
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. The government did not timely respond to the motion for stay of removal. The absence of a response is treated as a statement of non-opposition; the temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 07/25/2022 04:38:00 PM]
June 22, 2022 Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 06/22/2022 09:12:00 AM]
June 21, 2022 Filing 9 Fee Paid by Lee Alejandro Espinoza-Urbina. Fee Receipt Number: A09-2601869-ACMS. [Entered: 06/21/2022 11:12:00 AM]
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 06/16/2022 09:26:00 AM]
June 1, 2022 Filing 7 ADDED Imran Raza Zaidi for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/01/2022 04:42:00 PM]
June 1, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Imran Raza Zaidi for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/01/2022 02:51:00 PM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 7/1/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 7/22/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/30/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 10/31/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/27/2022 01:38:00 PM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/27/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-946 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/27/2022 01:35:00 PM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/27/2022 11:25:00 AM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 5/5/2022. [Entered: 05/27/2022 11:24:00 AM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/27/2022 11:23:00 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Espinoza-Urbina v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LEE ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA-URBINA
Represented By: Christopher James Todd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Lindsay Brooke Glauner
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Mr. Imran Raza Zaidi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?