Constantin, et al. v. Garland
| MARIAN CRISTINEL CONSTANTIN, MANUELA MIHAELA CONSTANTIN, JOSEPH CONSTANTIN, MARIUS RUBIN CONSTANTIN and FILOMENA CONSTANTIN |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-1015 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 19) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 11/27/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/18/2023 12:04 PM]
|
| Filing 19 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/18/2023 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 18 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 12 by Petitioner Marian Cristinel Constantin, Petitioner Manuela Mihaela Constantin, Petitioner Joseph Constantin, Petitioner Marius Rubin Constantin, Petitioner Filomena Constantin received. [Entered: 09/25/2023 12:09 PM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 12 by Petitioners is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/31/2023 12:01 PM]
|
| Filing 16 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Carmel Aileen Morgan representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/30/2023 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 15 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Victor Matthew Lawrence [Entered: 08/30/2023 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Victor Matthew Lawrence for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Carmel Aileen Morgan. [Entered: 08/30/2023 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE --- EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Petitioner Marian Cristinel Constantin, Petitioner Manuela Mihaela Constantin, Petitioner Joseph Constantin, Petitioner Marius Rubin Constantin, Petitioner Filomena Constantin.--[Duplicate and incorrect filing of CAR docs, correct entry is DE 8] [Entered: 08/28/2023 03:05 PM] [Edited: 08/31/2023 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 12 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Marian Cristinel Constantin, Petitioner Manuela Mihaela Constantin, Petitioner Joseph Constantin, Petitioner Marius Rubin Constantin, Petitioner Filomena Constantin.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief] [Entered: 08/28/2023 02:52 PM] [Edited: 08/31/2023 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Marian Cristinel Constantin, Petitioner Manuela Mihaela Constantin, Petitioner Joseph Constantin, Petitioner Marius Rubin Constantin, Petitioner Filomena Constantin.--[Duplicate entry, correct entry is DE 12] [Entered: 08/28/2023 02:41 PM] [Edited: 08/31/2023 10:46 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 07/20/2023 09:55 AM]
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/20/2023 07:23 AM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 06/09/2023 08:16 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Carmel Aileen Morgan for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/25/2023 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carmel Aileen Morgan for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/25/2023 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/29/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 7/20/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/28/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 10/27/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/25/2023 07:27 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/24/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-1015 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/25/2023 07:25 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/25/2023 07:24 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/25/2023 07:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/25/2023 07:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
