Rivera-Trigueros v. Garland
| DENNIS RIVERA-TRIGUEROS |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-110 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 36 Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 34 by Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros received. [Entered: 10/23/2023 10:25 AM] |
Filing 35
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 34 by Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/19/2023 08:59 AM]
|
| Filing 34 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros. [Entered: 10/18/2023 10:46 PM] |
| Filing 33 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Niels W. Frenzen. [Entered: 10/06/2023 09:23 PM] |
| Filing 32 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for February 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-110] [Entered: 10/05/2023 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 31 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Niels W. Frenzen. [Entered: 09/20/2023 08:18 PM] |
| Filing 30 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for January 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-110] [Entered: 09/19/2023 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 29 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 25 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 09/01/2023 11:13 AM] |
|
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days (DE 27) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 10/18/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 08/29/2023 12:13 PM]
|
| Filing 27 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros. [Entered: 08/29/2023 11:06 AM] |
|
Filing 26
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 25 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/29/2023 10:43 AM]
|
| Filing 25 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/28/2023 04:38 PM] |
|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 23) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 8/28/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/17/2023 09:27 AM]
|
| Filing 23 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/17/2023 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 22 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 20 by Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros received. [Entered: 06/05/2023 03:00 PM] |
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 20 by Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 05/31/2023 02:25 PM]
|
| Filing 20 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros. [Entered: 05/30/2023 09:54 PM] |
| Filing 19 REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros. [Entered: 04/21/2023 11:02 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due 5/30/2023, Answering Brief Due 7/27/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/21/2023 11:27 AM]
|
| Filing 17 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros. [Entered: 04/20/2023 09:56 PM] |
| Filing 16 OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/14/2023 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 15 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros. [Entered: 03/24/2023 08:48 PM] |
| Filing 14 Fee Paid by Dennis Rivera-Trigueros. Fee Receipt Number: A09-2603243-ACMS. [Entered: 02/23/2023 10:58 PM] [Edited: 02/24/2023 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 13 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Niels W. Frenzen for Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros. [Entered: 02/09/2023 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Niels W. Frenzen for Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros. [Entered: 02/08/2023 05:18 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 9) for an extension of time to file a supplemental motion for a stay of removal is granted. Petitioners supplemental motion for a stay of removal is now due on or before March 24, 2023. The response to the motion for a stay of removal is now due April 14, 2023. The opening brief remains due April 28, 2023. The answering brief is due June 27, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Pursuant to the courts January 26, 2023 order at Docket Entry No. 8, the filing fee or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis remain due on or before February 23, 2023. [Entered: 02/06/2023 01:53 PM]
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 02/02/2023 08:25 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to extend time to file supplemental motion to stay removal filed by Petitioner Dennis Rivera-Trigueros. [Entered: 02/01/2023 06:26 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 01/26/2023 12:25 PM]
|
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Elizabeth Dewar for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/23/2023 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Elizabeth Dewar for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/23/2023 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 2/27/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 3/20/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/28/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 6/27/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/23/2023 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 1/20/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-110 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/23/2023 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 01/23/2023 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 12/22/2022. [Entered: 01/23/2023 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 01/23/2023 10:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rivera-Trigueros v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DENNIS RIVERA-TRIGUEROS | |
| Represented By: | Professor Niels W. Frenzen |
| Represented By: | Jean Elizabeth Reisz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Dewar |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
