Romero Hernandez v. Garland
| ESTEBAN ROMERO HERNANDEZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-138 |
| January 30, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. Pursuant to petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 27), the Clerk will close this courts docket for administrative purposes until further order of the court. This order is not a decision on the merits and has no impact on any stay of removal. No mandate will issue, and at any time any party may request that this immigration petition be reopened, or the court may reopen the petition sua sponte. Within 14 days after a determination at the agency level that petitioner is eligible for discretionary relief, the parties are expected to file a motion to remand. The parties may request a referral to mediation at any time it might benefit the case. [Entered: 07/21/2023 02:43 PM]
|
| Filing 27 MOTION to administratively close case filed by Petitioner Esteban Romero Hernandez. [Entered: 07/18/2023 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 26 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Seattle. Please consult with opposing counsel and review the Seattle sitting dates for November 2023 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-138] [Entered: 07/12/2023 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 25 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 23 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 07/10/2023 03:57 PM] |
|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 23 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/30/2023 04:21 PM]
|
| Filing 23 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/29/2023 05:36 PM] |
| Filing 22 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Joseph D. Hardy representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/08/2023 06:04 PM] |
| Filing 21 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Kathleen Kelly Volkert for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/08/2023 05:59 PM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kathleen Kelly Volkert for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Joseph D. Hardy. [Entered: 05/08/2023 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 19 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 17 by Petitioner Esteban Romero Hernandez received. [Entered: 05/05/2023 12:07 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 17 by Petitioner Esteban Romero Hernandez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 05/02/2023 09:49 AM]
|
| Filing 17 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Esteban Romero Hernandez. [Entered: 05/01/2023 04:53 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. The due date for the response to the motion to the stay of removal in the February 8, 2023, order at Docket Entry No. 14 is vacated. A statement of non-opposition has been filed. The opening brief remains due May 5, 2023. The answering brief is due July 5, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 02/13/2023 11:42 AM]
|
| Filing 15 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 02/10/2023 07:26 AM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 2) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The certified administrative record remains due March 6, 2023. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due March 27, 2023. The opening brief is due May 5, 2023. The answering brief is due July 5, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 02/08/2023 09:54 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 02/06/2023 02:06 PM]
|
| Filing 12 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/03/2023 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 11 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/31/2023 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Joseph D. Hardy for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/31/2023 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/31/2023 06:56 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph D. Hardy for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/31/2023 06:54 AM] |
| Filing 7 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 3/6/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 3/27/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 5/5/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 7/5/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/30/2023 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 1/30/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-138 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/30/2023 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 01/30/2023 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 10/23/2018. [Entered: 01/30/2023 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 1/6/2023. [Entered: 01/30/2023 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 01/30/2023 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 01/30/2023 03:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Romero Hernandez v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ESTEBAN ROMERO HERNANDEZ | |
| Represented By: | Liya Djamilova |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Mr. Anthony Cardozo Payne |
| Represented By: | Kathleen Kelly Volkert |
| Represented By: | Mr. Joseph D. Hardy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
