Singh v. Garland
| SURINDER SINGH |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-143 |
| January 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for March 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-143] [Entered: 11/03/2023 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 24 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Mike Singh Sethi. [Entered: 10/11/2023 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 23 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 10/10/2023 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 22 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for February 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-143] [Entered: 10/06/2023 05:01 PM] |
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/03/2023 04:09 PM]
|
| Filing 20 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/29/2023 01:20 PM] |
|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 18) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due October 6, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/25/2023 02:06 PM]
|
| Filing 18 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/21/2023 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 17 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Surinder Singh received. [Entered: 07/07/2023 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 16 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Matthew Albert Connelly for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/13/2023 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matthew Albert Connelly for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/13/2023 01:52 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Surinder Singh is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/08/2023 11:40 AM]
|
| Filing 13 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Surinder Singh. [Entered: 06/07/2023 03:07 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due 6/7/2023, Answering Brief Due 8/7/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/05/2023 12:10 PM]
|
| Filing 11 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Surinder Singh. [Entered: 05/05/2023 11:57 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 03/23/2023 09:59 AM]
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/23/2023 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 02/14/2023 06:55 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent David Kim for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/01/2023 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Kim for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/01/2023 07:46 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 3/7/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 3/28/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 5/8/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 7/5/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/31/2023 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 1/31/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-143 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/31/2023 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 1/13/2023. [Entered: 01/31/2023 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 01/31/2023 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 01/31/2023 03:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Singh v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SURINDER SINGH | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Mike Singh Sethi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Matthew Albert Connelly |
| Represented By: | Mr. David Kim |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
