Douglas Hulstedt v. State of California, et al
| DOUGLAS VERN HULSTEDT |
| STATE OF CALIFORNIA, as Guarantor, UNITED STATES, as Guarantor and THOMAS OSTLY |
| 23-15008 |
| January 4, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GABRIEL P. SANCHEZ): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12639284] (AF) [Entered: 01/26/2023 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 01/11/2023. [12633992] (RT) [Entered: 01/19/2023 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Douglas Vern Hulstedt opening brief due 03/06/2023. Appellees Thomas Ostly, State of California and United States answering brief due 04/03/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12622686] (JMR) [Entered: 01/04/2023 11:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
