Thomas Bastian v. Rondald Evans, et al
THOMAS O. BASTIAN |
RONDALD EVANS, Deputy Warden at ADCCR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1, BETTY ULIBERRI-RUIZ, Paralegal at ADCRR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1, R SILVA, COIV/ Disciplinary Hearing Office at ADCRR/ Eyman Complex, A PARCELS, ADCRR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1 Sgt, T PINNEY, Librarian II at ADCRR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1, GABREILLE SCHNEIDER, Disciplinary Coordinator/ COIII at ADCRR Eyman Complex SMU 1, MUKORA, Unknown; Special Security Unit Officer at ADCRR Eyman Complex SMU 1, LEON, Unknown ; Special Security Unit Officer at ADCRR Eyman Complex SMU 1, VASQUEZ, Sgt Unknown ;Special Security Unit Sgt at ADCRR Eyman Complex SMU 1, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as John/Jane Doe, Administrator at ADCRR Eyman Complex SMU 1 and ANTHONY PARCELS, Property Sgt. at ADCRR/Eyman/SMU 1 |
23-15012 |
January 4, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Filed motion. Deficiencies: None. Served on. [12653963] Filed Appellant Thomas O. Bastian motion for extension of time. Deficiencies: None. (used streamlined request form). [12653963] (NAC) [Entered: 02/15/2023 02:43 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely-filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), and that motion is still pending in the district court. The December 30, 2022 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending December 22, 2022 motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant must file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk will serve this order on the district court. [12652647] (CKP) [Entered: 02/14/2023 10:17 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Thomas O. Bastian motion for perliminary injunction. Deficiencies: None. [12645921] (NAC) [Entered: 02/03/2023 02:33 PM] |
Filing 3 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request received on 01/20/2023. [12635178] (JR) [Entered: 01/20/2023 03:28 PM] |
Filing 2 Received Appellant Thomas O. Bastian request for copy of FRAP Rules and docket sheet. [12635129] (NAC) [Entered: 01/20/2023 02:59 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Thomas O. Bastian opening brief due 02/28/2023. [12622982] (ABT) [Entered: 01/04/2023 02:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Thomas Bastian v. Rondald Evans, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: THOMAS O. BASTIAN | |
Represented By: | Thomas O. Bastian |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: RONDALD EVANS, Deputy Warden at ADCCR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: BETTY ULIBERRI-RUIZ, Paralegal at ADCRR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: R SILVA, COIV/ Disciplinary Hearing Office at ADCRR/ Eyman Complex | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: A PARCELS, ADCRR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1 Sgt | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: T PINNEY, Librarian II at ADCRR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: GABREILLE SCHNEIDER, Disciplinary Coordinator/ COIII at ADCRR Eyman Complex SMU 1 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: MUKORA, Unknown; Special Security Unit Officer at ADCRR Eyman Complex SMU 1 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: LEON, Unknown ; Special Security Unit Officer at ADCRR Eyman Complex SMU 1 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: VASQUEZ, Sgt Unknown ;Special Security Unit Sgt at ADCRR Eyman Complex SMU 1 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: UNKNOWN PARTY, named as John/Jane Doe, Administrator at ADCRR Eyman Complex SMU 1 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: ANTHONY PARCELS, Property Sgt. at ADCRR/Eyman/SMU 1 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.