Mark Baird, et al v. Rob Bonta
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK BAIRD and RICHARD GALLARDO
Defendant / Appellee: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Case Number: 23-15016
Filed: January 5, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 7, 2023 Summary MARK BAIRD, ET AL V. ROB BONTA

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2023 Filing 13 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for June 26-30, 2023 at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 immediately using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter immediately , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation). [12666335] (CSR) [Entered: 03/02/2023 03:34 PM]
March 2, 2023 Filing 12 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 10 ] filed by Rob Bonta. [12666050] (SD) [Entered: 03/02/2023 01:33 PM]
February 28, 2023 Filing 11 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 10 ] submitted by Rob Bonta is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12663955] (JMR) [Entered: 02/28/2023 02:33 PM]
February 28, 2023 Filing 10 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Rob Bonta. Date of service: 02/28/2023. [12663639] [23-15016] (Davis, Ryan) [Entered: 02/28/2023 11:39 AM]
February 7, 2023 Filing 9 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 6 ] in 3 volume(s) and index volume filed by Mark Baird and Richard Gallardo. [12648367] (CPA) [Entered: 02/07/2023 03:27 PM]
February 7, 2023 Filing 8 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 5 ] filed by Mark Baird and Richard Gallardo. [12648355] (CPA) [Entered: 02/07/2023 03:21 PM]
February 2, 2023 Filing 7 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 5 ] submitted by Mark Baird and Richard Gallardo is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 6 ] submitted by Mark Baird and Richard Gallardo are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12644657] (JMR) [Entered: 02/02/2023 10:07 AM]
January 31, 2023 Filing 6 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Mark Baird and Richard Gallardo. Date of service: 01/31/2023. [12643587] [23-15016]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts. 02/02/2023 by JMR] (Bellantoni, Amy) [Entered: 01/31/2023 08:46 PM]
January 31, 2023 Filing 5 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Mark Baird and Richard Gallardo. Date of service: 01/31/2023. [12643586] [23-15016]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief. 02/02/2023 by JMR] (Bellantoni, Amy) [Entered: 01/31/2023 08:37 PM]
January 9, 2023 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/09/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12626511]. [23-15016] (AD) [Entered: 01/09/2023 07:01 PM]
January 9, 2023 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellee Rob Bonta Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/09/2023. [12626391] [23-15016] (Davis, Ryan) [Entered: 01/09/2023 04:20 PM]
January 5, 2023 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): The appeal filed January 3, 2023 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due no later than January 31, 2023; the answering brief is due February 28, 2023 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12623843] (AF) [Entered: 01/05/2023 01:39 PM]
January 5, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: To be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal, C.R. 3-3. [12623580] (JBS) [Entered: 01/05/2023 10:40 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mark Baird, et al v. Rob Bonta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MARK BAIRD
Represented By: Amy L. Bellantoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RICHARD GALLARDO
Represented By: Amy L. Bellantoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Represented By: Ryan Richard Davis
Represented By: R. Matthew Wise Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?