Michael Crane v. David Shinn, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL LEE CRANE
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, UNKNOWN FREELAND and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Case Number: 23-15031
Filed: January 11, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2023 Filing 6 MANDATE ISSUED. (KMW, RRC and GPS) [12654509] (HH) [Entered: 02/16/2023 10:15 AM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 5 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GABRIEL P. SANCHEZ) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)); see also Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12638686] (WL) [Entered: 01/25/2023 03:22 PM]
January 12, 2023 Filing 4 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court, filed 1/11/2023. [12629517] (HH) [Entered: 01/12/2023 02:04 PM]
January 12, 2023 Filing 3 Appellee Unknown Freeland substituted by Appellee David Shinn in 23-15031. [12629199] (HH) [Entered: 01/12/2023 11:01 AM]
January 12, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellees Attorney General for the State of Arizona and Unknown Freeland Correspondence: David Shinn, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections is the appropriate party and should be substituted for Unknown Freeland, et al. Date of service: 01/12/2023 [12629168] [23-15031] (Kelly, Tanja) [Entered: 01/12/2023 10:43 AM]
January 11, 2023 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12628156] (WL) [Entered: 01/11/2023 12:03 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Crane v. David Shinn, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: MICHAEL LEE CRANE
Represented By: Michael Lee Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
Represented By: Tanja K. Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNKNOWN FREELAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Represented By: Tanja K. Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?