Matthew Houston v. Joe Lombardo, et al
| MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON |
| JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff, CAROLYN GOODMAN, MIRANDA M. DU, DAVID M. JONES and CALVIN JOHNSON |
| 23-15067 |
| January 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Matthew Travis Houston motion to reconsider. Deficiencies: None. Not dated. [12673909] (RL) [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and DANIEL A. BRESS) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the November 30, 2022 magistrate judge order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. A review of the district court docket reflects that, to date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the final order and judgment entered in the district court on January 30, 2023. DISMISSED. [12662309] (JBS) [Entered: 02/27/2023 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Matthew Travis Houston addendum to motion for reconsideration. Not dated. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12661095] (RL) [Entered: 02/24/2023 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Matthew Travis Houston motion for reconsideration. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/31/2023. [12650581] (RL) [Entered: 02/10/2023 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Matthew Travis Houston opening brief due 03/14/2023. [12634017] (ABT) [Entered: 01/19/2023 01:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
