Marcel Sieler v. Atieva, Inc., et al
| MARCEL SIELER |
| ERIC MAGNUS BACH, HANS-CHRISTOPH ECKSTEIN, WIEBKE ECKSTEIN and ATIEVA, INC., DBA Lucid Motors |
| 23-15068 |
| January 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Patent |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): On or before March 3, 2023, counsel shall provide a separate confidential status reports by email to the Circuit Mediator (Robert_Kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov). Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. The status report should not be filed with the court. The time period within which the appellant may respond to this courts order dated February 9, 2023, is extended to March 13, 2023, and the Appellees optional response is March 23, 2023. [12666223] (JBS) [Entered: 03/02/2023 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 02/23/2023, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [12653926] (VS) [Entered: 02/15/2023 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (A district court order is . . . not appealable [under 1291] unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981))). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12650022] (JBS) [Entered: 02/09/2023 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/26/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12640214]. [23-15068] (AD) [Entered: 01/26/2023 07:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Marcel Sieler Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/26/2023. [12640090] [23-15068] (Chen, Quynh) [Entered: 01/26/2023 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Marcel Sieler Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/26/2023. Transcript ordered by 02/13/2023. Transcript due 03/13/2023. Appellant Marcel Sieler opening brief due 04/24/2023. Appellees Atieva, Inc., Eric Magnus Bach, Hans-Christoph Eckstein and Wiebke Eckstein answering brief due 05/24/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12634020] (JBS) [Entered: 01/19/2023 01:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
