Gary Rosales v. Q. Byrne, et al
GARY CRAIG ROSALES |
Q. BYRNE, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, Director Nevada Department of Corrections and GABRIELA NAJERA, Substitted for Dwight Neven |
23-15081 |
January 23, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NA): Appellants motion for an extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is granted. Any request for a certificate of appealability is due by May 24, 2023.[12661499] (JMR) [Entered: 02/24/2023 04:25 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Gary Craig Rosales Motion to extend time to file COA request until 05/24/2023. Date of service: 02/23/2023. [12659860] [23-15081] (Kirshbaum, Jonathan) [Entered: 02/23/2023 12:14 PM] |
Filing 3 Attorney Rick A. Mula in 23-15081 substituted by Attorney Jonathan Michael Kirshbaum in 23-15081 [12637750] (JFF) [Entered: 01/24/2023 04:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jonathan M. Kirshbaum (Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada, 411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101) for Appellant Gary Craig Rosales. Substitution for Attorney Rick A. Mula for Appellant Gary Craig Rosales. Date of service: 01/24/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12637686] [23-15081] (Kirshbaum, Jonathan) [Entered: 01/24/2023 04:18 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 12/27/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12635738] (JMR) [Entered: 01/23/2023 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.