Johnny Walls-Bey v. Phoenix, City of, et al
| JOHNNY RAY WALLS-BEY, AKA Johnny Procopio, AKA Johnny Ray Walls |
| PHOENIX, CITY OF, PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT and DANNY OLMOS, #08700 |
| 23-15130 |
| January 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| JOHNNY WALLS-BEY V. PHOENIX, CITY OF, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Streamlined request by Appellant Johnny Ray Walls-Bey to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary upon the Courts disposition of the motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Docket [4]. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12658598] (DLM) [Entered: 02/22/2023 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Johnny Ray Walls-Bey motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/07/2023. [12656198] (HH) [Entered: 02/17/2023 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12644121] (CKP) [Entered: 02/01/2023 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 23-15130: IFP] ). [12644118] (CKP) [Entered: 02/01/2023 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Johnny Ray Walls-Bey opening brief due 03/31/2023. [12643539] (ABT) [Entered: 01/31/2023 05:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
