Lamont Karriem v. Cellco Partnership, et al
| LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM |
| CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA Verizon Wireless, KELLY MAHILL, BRETT ZIMMERMAN, Assistant Sheriff in his personal capacity, CHRISTOPHER C. JONES, Attorney, Assistant Sheriff in his personal capacity, JUSTIN ZINGER, Detective in his personal capacity, BRIAN IULO, Detective in his personal capacity, MICHELE FREEMAN, Chief in her personal capacity, COUNTY OF CLARK, NEVADA, KELLY MCMAHILL, JOSEPH LOMBARDO, Sheriff in his personal capacity, MICHAEL EVANS, Officer in his personal capacity, JAKE FREEMAN, Detective in his personal capacity, CITY OF LAS VEGAS, ELIX NUNEZ, LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRISTOPHER DARCY, Assistant Sheriff in his personal capacity, KEVIN C. MCMAHILL, Undersheriff in his personal capacity, EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC., ERIC GOODMAN, Judge in personal capacity, ESH HOSPITALITY, INC and SUZAN BAUCUM, Chief Judge in her personal capacity |
| 23-15164 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Lamont Garner Karriem statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 03/15/2023. [12677959] (RL) [Entered: 03/20/2023 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Lamont Garner Karriem FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/15/2023. [12677958] (RL) [Entered: 03/20/2023 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12650048] (CKP) [Entered: 02/09/2023 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 02/07/2023 ORDER revoking in forma pauperis. [12649193] (RL) [Entered: 02/08/2023 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12648185] (CKP) [Entered: 02/07/2023 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lamont Garner Karriem opening brief due 04/06/2023. [12648012] (JBS) [Entered: 02/07/2023 12:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
