Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
| PAUL DAVID JOHNSON |
| THUDDY, MD., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, MD, A. J. FILICE, Dr., YUEN CHEN, MD, COLLINSWORTH, MD, J. CRAMMER, Physician, PA CTF, WIN, HLA, MD, NORMA ACQUVA, MD, HCM, A. TRAQUINA, MD., CMO, M. KIM, MD, CMO, J. A. BEARD, Director of CDCR, M. E. SPEARMAN, Warden of CTF, JOSEPH CHUDY, M.D. and IAN CRANMER, PA-C |
| 23-15167 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Received original and 2 copies of Appellant Paul David Johnson opening brief of 8 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 03/03/2023. Major deficiency: case is closed. [12681448] (LA) [Entered: 03/24/2023 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (WCC, MDS and DAB) [12678158] (RL) [Entered: 03/21/2023 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and DANIEL A. BRESS) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the January 24, 2023 Clerks declination of default challenged in the appeal is not a final and appealable post-judgment order. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; American Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. North Am. Constr. Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 898 (9th Cir. 2001) (court lacks jurisdiction to review an appeal from a post-judgment order that is a mere ministerial order); cf. Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12662282] (JBS) [Entered: 02/27/2023 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Paul David Johnson opening brief due 04/07/2023. Appellees Norma Acquva, J. A. Beard, Yuen Chen, Joseph Chudy, Collinsworth, J. Crammer, Ian Cranmer, A. J. Filice, M. Kim, F. Kreitler, L. W. Rohlfing, M. E. Spearman, Thuddy, A. Traquina and Win answering brief due 05/08/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12648359] (ABT) [Entered: 02/07/2023 03:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
