Thomas Stewart, Jr. v. Arizona, State of, et al
| THOMAS STEWART, Jr. |
| ARIZONA, STATE OF, MARICOPA, COUNTY OF, D SHELL RYAN, #09838, IRENE HILLARD, JERE JACKSON, J REYES, ANTHONY PHEFFER, Phoenix Oasis Re-entry Service, CANYON APARTMENTS, named as The Canyon Apartments, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as Maricopa County's Phoenix Homeless Shelter CASS, LISA GLOW, Counsel, CRISTINE GARDIYER, Human Campus Services, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as John and Jane Doe, CBI, Project 8, PHOENIX, CITY OF, VERNON LORENZ, Defense Attorney Contract, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Named as ADOT, Arizona Motor Vehicle Division, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Named as DMV Pennsylvania King of Prussa PA, TANNER TERRACE APARTMENTS, JUST-A-CENTER, UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as Rudy Doe, UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as Wendy Doe and MARICOPA COUNTY VICTIM SERVICE DIVISION |
| 23-15173 |
| February 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Received copy of District Court order filed on 04/07/2023. ORDER denying [17] Motion re erratum and [18] Objections re: 23-15173 as to [19] Notice of Appeal. [12691472] (QDL) [Entered: 04/07/2023 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The district courts judgment was entered on January 25, 2023. On February 6, 2023 motion, the district court received appellants notice of appeal and contemporaneous objections to the district courts January 25, 2023 final order. Appellants February 6, 2023 objections may constitute one of the motions listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). Proceedings in this court are stayed until the district court determines whether appellants February 6, 2023 objections fall within those motions listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4) and, if so, whether the motion should be granted or denied. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1. Within 21 days after the district courts decision, appellant must notify this court in writing of the decision and state whether appellant wishes to move forward with this appeal. To challenge the decision on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time set by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). The Clerk will send a copy of this order to the district court. [12671670] (CKP) [Entered: 03/10/2023 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 Mail returned on 02/21/2023 addressed to Thomas Stewart, Jr., re: [ # 1 ] Case Opening Document. Returned envelope notes: Return to Sender, No longer in ADC custody. Resending to: P.O. Box 1201 Phoenix, AZ 85001-1201 [12660595] (JBS) [Entered: 02/24/2023 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Thomas Stewart Jr. opening brief due 04/07/2023. [12648864] (ABT) [Entered: 02/08/2023 11:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
