Deyoe Harris v. Viola Romero, et al
| DEYOE R. HARRIS |
| VIOLA ROMERO, City of Tucson Attorney, in the official and personal capacity and BERNARD GREENE, City of Tucson Attorney, in the official and personal capacity |
| 23-15184 |
| February 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Deyoe R. Harris motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/16/2023. [12670898] (BJK) [Entered: 03/09/2023 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Deyoe R. Harris Form 27 motion rthat appeal should go forward. Served on 03/06/2023. [12670893] (BJK) [Entered: 03/09/2023 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on February 16, 2023, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. Because there are no appearances by appellees, briefing is complete. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12666233] (CKP) [Entered: 03/02/2023 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of District Court order filed on 02/22/2023 revoking IFP status.[12660206] (BJK) [Entered: 02/23/2023 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Deyoe R. Harris opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 02/16/2023. [12655102] (KWG) [Entered: 02/16/2023 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12651100] (CKP) [Entered: 02/10/2023 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Deyoe R. Harris opening brief due 04/10/2023. [12650610] (JMR) [Entered: 02/10/2023 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Deyoe Harris v. Viola Romero, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DEYOE R. HARRIS | |
| Represented By: | Deyoe R. Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: VIOLA ROMERO, City of Tucson Attorney, in the official and personal capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: BERNARD GREENE, City of Tucson Attorney, in the official and personal capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
