Kentrell Welch v. Gavin Liggett, et al
| KENTRELL D. WELCH |
| GAVIN LIGGETT, JAMES LARRY WUEST, JORDAN GUNDERSON, DUGAN, C.C. S.W. Sgt, WILLIAMS and NASH, Miss |
| 23-15200 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| KENTRELL WELCH V. GAVIN LIGGETT, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and that such permission has not been revoked. Accordingly, appellants in forma pauperis status continues in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is therefore unnecessary. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), however, appellant eventually must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal. Accordingly, within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall complete and file with this court a prisoner authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellants trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), (e)(2). If appellant fails to comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief is due May 22, 2023. The answering brief is due June 21, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The Clerk shall serve a prisoner authorization form on counsel for appellant.[12685676] (WL) [Entered: 03/30/2023 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kentrell D. Welch Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 03/15/2023. [12674985] [23-15200] (Fiedler, Randolph) [Entered: 03/15/2023 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 23-15200: IFP] ). [12663928] (TSP) [Entered: 02/28/2023 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/21/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12658030]. [23-15200] (AD) [Entered: 02/21/2023 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kentrell D. Welch Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/21/2023. [12657640] [23-15200] (Newman, Stacy) [Entered: 02/21/2023 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kentrell D. Welch Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/21/2023. Transcript ordered by 03/13/2023. Transcript due 04/11/2023. Appellant Kentrell D. Welch opening brief due 05/22/2023. Appellees Dugan, Jordan Gunderson, Gavin Liggett, Nash, Williams and James Larry Wuest answering brief due 06/20/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12652711] (ABT) [Entered: 02/14/2023 10:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
