Ammar Harris v. County of Clark, et al
| AMMAR HARRIS |
| COUNTY OF CLARK, STEVEN B. WOLFSON, KATHLEEN E. DELANEY, KAREN HUGHES, D. HOIER, CATHERINE HUI, A. BECIS, CHRISTOPHER BAUGHMAN, A. BACCI, A. ORTIZ and K. BLUTTI |
| 23-15218 |
| February 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MANDATE ISSUED. (WCC, MDS and DAB) [12680174] (HH) [Entered: 03/23/2023 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 5 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request filed on 03-06-2023. [12668717] (JR) [Entered: 03/07/2023 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Ammar Harris letter dated 02/27/2023 re: Requesting docket and copy of rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12668421] (HH) [Entered: 03/06/2023 05:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Ammar Harris motion to correct parties lsting. Deficiencies: Case closed. Served on 02/27/2023. [12668419] (HH) [Entered: 03/06/2023 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and DANIEL A. BRESS) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court has not issued any orders that are final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12664549] (ABT) [Entered: 03/01/2023 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ammar Harris opening brief due 04/18/2023. [12656888] (ABT) [Entered: 02/21/2023 10:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
