Antonio Zayas, et al v. State Farm Insurance, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONIO ZAYAS and SVETLANA NARBAEVA
Defendant / Appellee: STATE FARM INSURANCE and NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE
Case Number: 23-15223
Filed: February 21, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2023 Filing 4 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and LUCY H. KOH) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the February 17, 2023 notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the district courts post-dismissal order entered on August 16, 2022. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional); Hollywood v. City of Santa Maria, 886 F.2d 1228, 1231 (9th Cir. 1989) (no separate judgment required for order denying post-judgment motion; time to appeal begins to run from entry of order denying post-judgment motion). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12686519] (WL) [Entered: 03/31/2023 12:09 PM]
March 24, 2023 Filing 3 Filed Appellants Svetlana Narbaeva and Antonio Zayas motion to consolidate with 22-15153. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/13/2023. [12681668] (HH) [Entered: 03/24/2023 04:07 PM]
March 14, 2023 Filing 2 Filed Appellants Svetlana Narbaeva and Antonio Zayas motion to consolidate case numbers 22-15153 and 23-15223. Deficiencies: None. [12673826] (QDL) [Entered: 03/14/2023 01:12 PM]
February 21, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Svetlana Narbaeva and Antonio Zayas opening brief due 04/24/2023. Appellees National General Insurance and State Farm Insurance answering brief due 05/24/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12657213] (RT) [Entered: 02/21/2023 12:31 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Antonio Zayas, et al v. State Farm Insurance, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ANTONIO ZAYAS
Represented By: Antonio Zayas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SVETLANA NARBAEVA
Represented By: Svetlana Narbaeva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STATE FARM INSURANCE
Represented By: John T. Farmer Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE
Represented By: Amanda Nicole Griffith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?