Ashenafi Aberha v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
| ASHENAFI G. ABERHA |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden |
| 23-15267 |
| February 27, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Attorney Geordan Goebel substituted by Attorney Katrina Lopez. [12701764] (RL) [Entered: 04/24/2023 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Katrina A. Lopez (State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General, 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101) for Appellees Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Brian Williams. Substitution for Attorney Geordan Goebel, Esquire for Appellees Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Brian Williams. Date of service: 04/24/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12701702] [23-15267] (Lopez, Katrina) [Entered: 04/24/2023 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NA): Appellants motion for an extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is granted. Any request for a certificate of appealability is due by May 30, 2023. [12686060] (JBS) [Entered: 03/30/2023 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ashenafi G. Aberha Motion to extend time to file COA request until 05/30/2023. Date of service: 03/29/2023. [12685206] [23-15267] (Barrera, Laura) [Entered: 03/29/2023 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 01/31/2023. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12662156] (WL) [Entered: 02/27/2023 10:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
