James Millner v. Scott Frauenheim
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES W. MILLNER
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden
Case Number: 23-15282
Filed: March 1, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant James W. Millner Motion for certificate of appealability. Date of service: 03/14/2023. [12673383] [23-15282] (Letarte, Diane) [Entered: 03/14/2023 04:28 AM]
March 1, 2023 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 02/08/2023. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12664575] (OC) [Entered: 03/01/2023 09:38 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Millner v. Scott Frauenheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: JAMES W. MILLNER
Represented By: Diane Letarte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden
Represented By: David Andrew Eldridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?