Nithya Vinayagam v. Andrew Pierce, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: NITHYA VINAYAGAM
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW F. PIERCE, PIERCE SHEARER LLP, SCOTT M. BERMAN, THOMAS MIHILL, JACQUETTA LANNAN, PAUL M. HELLER, HELLER IMMIGRATION LAW GROUP and ADAMS LAW OFFICES
Case Number: 23-15307
Filed: March 3, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 2, 2024 NITHYA VINAYAGAM V. ANDREW PIERCE, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2023 Filing 6 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 23-15307: IFP] ). [12693346] (AF) [Entered: 04/11/2023 11:44 AM]
April 11, 2023 Filing 5 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The opening brief is due May 8, 2023. The answering brief is due June 8, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellees must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. Id. (MOATT) [12693344] (AF) [Entered: 04/11/2023 11:44 AM]
March 8, 2023 Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 23-15307: IFP Pending In COA] ). [12669399] (NAC) [Entered: 03/08/2023 07:17 AM]
March 8, 2023 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Nithya Vinayagam Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Form 4). Date of service: 03/08/2023. [12669378] [23-15307] (Vinayagam, Nithya) [Entered: 03/08/2023 12:50 AM]
March 6, 2023 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12667820] (CKP) [Entered: 03/06/2023 12:13 PM]
March 6, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Nithya Vinayagam opening brief due 05/08/2023. Appellees Adams Law Offices, Scott M. Berman, Paul M. Heller, Heller Immigration Law Group, Jacquetta Lannan, Thomas Mihill, Andrew F. Pierce and Pierce Shearer LLP answering brief due 06/08/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12667641]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached correct PDF of case opening packet.. 03/06/2023 by SLM] (RT) [Entered: 03/06/2023 10:40 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nithya Vinayagam v. Andrew Pierce, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: NITHYA VINAYAGAM
Represented By: Nithya Vinayagam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANDREW F. PIERCE
Represented By: Peter H. Bales
Represented By: Peter Bales Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PIERCE SHEARER LLP
Represented By: Peter H. Bales
Represented By: Peter Bales Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SCOTT M. BERMAN
Represented By: Peter H. Bales
Represented By: Peter Bales Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THOMAS MIHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JACQUETTA LANNAN
Represented By: Peter H. Bales
Represented By: Peter Bales Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PAUL M. HELLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HELLER IMMIGRATION LAW GROUP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ADAMS LAW OFFICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?