Ty Thomas v. James Dzurenda, et al
Plaintiff / Appellee: TY THOMAS
Defendant / Appellant: JAMES DZURENDA and DR. MARTIN NAUGHTON
Case Number: 23-15336
Filed: March 9, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2023 Filing 11 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 04/24/2023, 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 04/18/2023). [12696241] (CL) [Entered: 04/14/2023 05:43 PM]
March 27, 2023 Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 04/18/2023, 2:30 p.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [12682178] (VS) [Entered: 03/27/2023 09:50 AM]
March 24, 2023 Filing 9 Added Attorney(s) Andrew Grimm for party(s) Appellee Ty Thomas, in case 23-15336. [12681625] (JFF) [Entered: 03/24/2023 03:43 PM]
March 24, 2023 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Andrew Grimm (Digital Justice Foundation, 15287 Pepperwood Drive, Omaha, Nebraska 68154) for Appellee Ty Thomas. Date of service: 03/24/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12681312] [23-15336] (Grimm, Andrew) [Entered: 03/24/2023 11:58 AM]
March 23, 2023 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 03/30/2023, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12680846] (VS) [Entered: 03/23/2023 04:26 PM]
March 20, 2023 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties are directed to address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Ballou v. McElvain, 29 F.4th 413, 421 (9th Cir. 2022) (noting that this courts jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity at summary judgment is limited to the question of whether the defendant would be entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law, assuming all factual disputes are resolved, and all reasonable inferences are drawn, in plaintiffs favor (citing Estate of Anderson v. Marsh, 985 F.3d 726, 731 (9th Cir. 2021))). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12677014] (WL) [Entered: 03/20/2023 09:53 AM]
March 17, 2023 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/17/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12676343]. [23-15336] (AD) [Entered: 03/17/2023 12:44 PM]
March 17, 2023 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants James Dzurenda and Martin Naughton Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/17/2023. [12675933] [23-15336] (Davis, Chris) [Entered: 03/17/2023 08:36 AM]
March 15, 2023 Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Chris Davis for party(s) Appellant Martin Naughton Appellant James Dzurenda, in case 23-15336. [12674811] (JFF) [Entered: 03/15/2023 02:42 PM]
March 15, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Chris William Davis (State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101) for Appellants James Dzurenda and Martin Naughton. Date of service: 03/15/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12674718] [23-15336] (Davis, Chris) [Entered: 03/15/2023 01:39 PM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants James Dzurenda and Martin Naughton Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/16/2023. Transcript ordered by 04/05/2023. Transcript due 05/05/2023. Appellants James Dzurenda and Martin Naughton opening brief due 06/14/2023. Appellee Ty Thomas answering brief due 07/14/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12670535] (JBS) [Entered: 03/09/2023 11:25 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ty Thomas v. James Dzurenda, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: TY THOMAS
Represented By: Ryan Andrew Hamilton
Represented By: Andrew Grimm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: JAMES DZURENDA
Represented By: Douglas Reed Rands Esquire
Represented By: Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: DR. MARTIN NAUGHTON
Represented By: Douglas Reed Rands Esquire
Represented By: Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?