Anderson v. Runge, et al.
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES P. ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee: KEVIN RUNGE, L. RICHARDSON and D. ARVIZO
Case Number: 23-1535
Filed: July 21, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [Entered: 10/12/2023 03:57 PM]
October 3, 2023 Filing 17 RESPONSE to court order (DE 16) filed by Appellant James P. Anderson. [Entered: 10/04/2023 12:15 PM]
September 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FILED. A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and that such permission has not been revoked. Accordingly, appellants in forma pauperis status continues in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docket Entry No. 6) is therefore unnecessary. On August 7, 2023, this court ordered appellant to complete and file with this court the enclosed prisoner authorization form. To date, appellant has not complied with this order. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant must sign and file with this court the enclosed prisoner authorization form. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief was filed on August 15, 2023. The briefing schedule is stayed pending resolution of appellants motion for appointment of counsel, which will be addressed by separate order. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11 The Clerk will send a copy of the August 7, 2023 order and a prisoner authorization form to appellant along with this order. [Entered: 09/20/2023 11:19 AM]
August 24, 2023 Filing 15 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Ryan Thomas Gille representing Appellee Kevin Runge, Appellee L. Richardson. [Entered: 08/24/2023 12:26 PM]
August 24, 2023 Filing 14 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Oliver Wu [Entered: 08/24/2023 12:25 PM]
August 24, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Oliver Wu for Appellee Kevin Runge, Appellee L. Richardson replacing Ryan Thomas Gille. [Entered: 08/24/2023 12:19 PM]
August 16, 2023 Filing 12 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of DE numbers 4-8 the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 requests filed on 08/14/2023. [Entered: 08/16/2023 02:58 PM]
August 15, 2023 Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant James P. Anderson is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 08/15/2023 01:02 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 11 REQUESTfor Public Information filed by Appellant James P. Anderson. [Entered: 08/15/2023 02:51 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 10 REQUESTfor Public Information filed by Appellant James P. Anderson. [Entered: 08/15/2023 02:47 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT to motion for appointment of counsel (DE 7) filed by Appellant James P. Anderson. [formatted on FORM 28] [Entered: 08/15/2023 02:41 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 8 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 08/15/2023 02:34 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant James P. Anderson. [Entered: 08/15/2023 02:20 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant James P. Anderson. [Entered: 08/15/2023 02:15 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant James P. Anderson. [Entered: 08/15/2023 12:56 PM]
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and that such permission has not been revoked. Accordingly, appellants in forma pauperis status continues in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). However, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), appellant must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal when funds are available in appellant's account. Within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant shall complete and file with this court the enclosed authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellant's trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) and (e)(2). Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellants prison trust account total less than $10.00, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal may be dismissed by the Clerk. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. The Clerk will send appellant a prisoner authorization form.U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) and (e)(2). Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellants prison trust account total less than $10.00, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal may be dismissed by the Clerk. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. The Clerk will send appellant a prisoner authorization form. [Entered: 08/07/2023 01:40 PM]
July 21, 2023 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal No RT Opening Brief Due 9/18/2023, Appeal No RT Answering Brief Due 10/17/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/21/2023 10:16 AM]
July 21, 2023 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:21-cv-00922-TLT has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-1535 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/21/2023 10:07 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Anderson v. Runge, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JAMES P. ANDERSON
Represented By: James P. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KEVIN RUNGE
Represented By: Oliver Wu
Represented By: Ryan Thomas Gille
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: L. RICHARDSON
Represented By: Oliver Wu
Represented By: Ryan Thomas Gille
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: D. ARVIZO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?