Andres Cabezas v. craigslist, Inc.
| ANDRES FERNANDO CABEZAS |
| CRAIGSLIST, INC. |
| 23-15369 |
| March 13, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), however, appellant eventually must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal. Accordingly, within 21 days of this order, appellant must complete and file with this court the enclosed prisoner authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellants trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), (e)(2). If appellant fails to comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief is due June 20, 2023. The answering brief is due July 20, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellee must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. See id. The Clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. (MOATT) [12708255] (JBS) [Entered: 05/03/2023 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Andres Fernando Cabezas motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12697018] (QDL) [Entered: 04/17/2023 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12673893] (CKP) [Entered: 03/14/2023 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Andres Fernando Cabezas opening brief due 05/15/2023. Appellee craigslist, Inc. answering brief due 06/15/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12673170] (RT) [Entered: 03/13/2023 03:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Andres Cabezas v. craigslist, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ANDRES FERNANDO CABEZAS | |
| Represented By: | Andres Fernando Cabezas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CRAIGSLIST, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Paul Llewellyn |
| Represented By: | Tobias George Snyder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
