Lucila Baptiste v. Apple Inc.
| LUCILA BAPTISTE |
| APPLE INC. |
| 23-15392 |
| March 17, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12690213] (CL) [Entered: 04/06/2023 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 6 Streamlined request [5] by Appellant Lucila Baptiste to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Lucila Baptiste opening brief due 06/14/2023. Appellee Apple Inc. answering brief due 07/14/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12689651] (DR) [Entered: 04/05/2023 12:43 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Lucila Baptiste. New requested due date is 06/14/2023. [12689542] [23-15392] (Fraietta, Philip) [Entered: 04/05/2023 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 04/05/2023, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12682561] (CL) [Entered: 03/27/2023 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/24/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12681362]. [23-15392] (AD) [Entered: 03/24/2023 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lucila Baptiste Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/24/2023. [12681177] [23-15392] (Fraietta, Philip) [Entered: 03/24/2023 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lucila Baptiste Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/24/2023. Appellant Lucila Baptiste opening brief due 05/15/2023. Appellee Apple Inc. answering brief due 06/12/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12676010] (ABT) [Entered: 03/17/2023 09:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lucila Baptiste v. Apple Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: LUCILA BAPTISTE | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence Timothy Fisher |
| Represented By: | Philip Lawrence Fraietta |
| Represented By: | Joel D. Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: APPLE INC. | |
| Represented By: | Randall W. Edwards Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
