Robbie White v. City of West Sacramento, et al
| CITY AND COUNTY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, FORTIER, individually and in his official capacity as a West Sacramento Police Dept. Officer, JASON MAHAFFEY, Officer, AUSTIN SCHREIBER, Officer and NATHAN OGDEN, Officer |
| ROBBIE D. WHITE |
| CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF YOLO, DAVID SANTOS, TOM LOPEZ, ANDREY KINDA, CHRISTOPHER COBB, DANIEL BOEHLE, MATTHEW MONTEZ and STEFAN IWANICKI |
| 23-15395 |
| March 17, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LKK) : Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ] ) for voluntary dismissal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court acts as the mandate of this court. [12698101] (RT) [Entered: 04/18/2023 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Robbie D. White Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 04/03/2023. [12688150] [23-15395] (Lawrence, Zachary) [Entered: 04/03/2023 06:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12682270] (BLS) [Entered: 03/27/2023 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Robbie D. White Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/24/2023. Transcript ordered by 04/14/2023. Transcript due 05/15/2023. Appellant Robbie D. White opening brief due 06/23/2023. Appellees Daniel Boehle, City of West Sacramento, Christopher Cobb, County of Yolo, Stefan Iwanicki, Andrey Kinda, Tom Lopez, Matthew Montez and David Santos answering brief due 07/24/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12676102] (JMR) [Entered: 03/17/2023 10:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
