Gary Easley v. Donald Trump, et al
| GARY D. EASLEY |
| DONALD J. TRUMP, JOSEPH R BIDEN, President, LUCY H. KOH, Judge, NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Judge, BETH LABSON FREEMAN, Judge, MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Judge, EDWARD F. LEE, Administrative Law Judge, Judge, KAISER HOSPITAL, VALLEY MEDICAL OF SANTA CLARA, WALGREENS, INC., RITE AIDE, ALLISON CLAIRE, KATARINA PENA, RUBEN T MUNOZ, AMY KIMPLE, SHERRY GLOVER, MADISON GLOVER, ROLAND BURNEY, CITY OF MORGAN HILL, SAFEWAY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CATHERINE EASLEY, THERESA MCCLURG, UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT, MEMBERS OF THE U.S. SENATE, MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, KIM TRAN, Nurse, VALLEY MEDICAL HOSPITAL, REY, Sheriff, GILROY POLICE DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON HOSPITAL, in Fremont California and DICKLER, Doctor |
| 23-15408 |
| March 20, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Mr. Gary D. Easley letter dated 08/21/2023 re: attempt to file motion for reconsideration. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12778930] (NAC) [Entered: 08/22/2023 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 06/21/2023). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [12765268] (CKP) [Entered: 07/31/2023 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellants motion for a second extension of time to respond to the courts April 19, 2023 order (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) is granted. Appellants response is due July 10, 2023. All other requests contained in Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ] will be addressed after appellant responds to the April 19, 2023 order. Briefing remains suspended. [12740124] (AF) [Entered: 06/21/2023 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Mr. Gary D. Easley motion to extend time to comply with the order. Deficiencies: None [12738110] (NAC) [Entered: 06/16/2023 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellants motion for an extension of time [ # 5 ] is construed as a motion for extension of time to respond to this courts April 19, 2023 order. So construed, the motion is granted. Appellant must file a response on or before June 9, 2023. The Clerk will send appellant a copy of the April 19, 2023 order to appellant along with this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. [12716857] (CKP) [Entered: 05/16/2023 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Mr. Gary D. Easley motion to extend time to file motion for In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12713041] (NAC) [Entered: 05/10/2023 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has discontinued appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12698777] (CKP) [Entered: 04/19/2023 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 04/07/2023. Discontinuing In Forma Pauperis status [12693153] (NAC) [Entered: 04/11/2023 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12678553] (CKP) [Entered: 03/21/2023 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gary D. Easley opening brief due 05/22/2023. [12677558] (RT) [Entered: 03/20/2023 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
