Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara, et al
| KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG |
| COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara, JOHN CHASE, Deputy District Attorney, County of Santa Clara, LAWRENCE E. STONE, Assessor, County of Santa Clara, JEANETTE TONINI, Senior Assessment Clerk, County of Santa Clara, JAMES R. WILLIAMS, County Counsel, County of Santa Clara, KARL A. SANDOVAL, Deputy County Counsel, County of Santa Clara, KARAN SINGH DHADIALLA, Deputy County Counsel, County of Santa Clara, JOSE L. MARTINEZ, Deputy County Counsel, County of Santa Clara, WINIFRED BOTHA, Deputy County Counsel, County of Santa Clara, SHANNON BUSHEY, Registrar of Voters, County of Santa Clara, CHRISTOPHER RUDY, Judge, Superior Court of California in and for the County of Santa Clara, JOSEPH H. HUBER, former Judge, Superior Court of California in and for the County of Santa Clara, ALEX RODRIGUEZ, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., former Governor, State of California, ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California and MICHAEL C. GASBARRO, Deputy Attorney General, State of California |
| 23-15473 |
| March 30, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kuang-Bao Ou-Young opening brief due 05/30/2023. [12685740] (RT) [Entered: 03/30/2023 12:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
