Michele Gray v. Capstone Financial, et al
| MICHELE GRAY |
| CAPSTONE FINANCIAL, TYLER STONE and CTP FUNDING |
| 23-15500 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Truth in Lending |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) for an extension of time to file a response to Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ] is granted. Any response is due June 26, 2023. [12722691] (AF) [Entered: 05/25/2023 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Ms. Michele Gray motion to extend time to file a response to Court order. Deficiencies: None. [12720957] (NAC) [Entered: 05/23/2023 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Ms. Michele Gray motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12698015] (NAC) [Entered: 04/18/2023 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12695463] (CKP) [Entered: 04/13/2023 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 04/11/2023. The Court elects to revoke Plaintiff's IFP status for her separate appeal of the attorney fee award in this matter re 23-15500. [12694079] (NAC) [Entered: 04/12/2023 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12690262] (CKP) [Entered: 04/06/2023 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michele Gray opening brief due 06/05/2023. Appellees CTP Funding, Capstone Financial and Tyler Stone answering brief due 07/05/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12689894] (RT) [Entered: 04/05/2023 03:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
