Lawrence Morelock v. Charmaine Yap, et al
| LAWRENCE MORELOCK |
| CHARMAINE YAP, AIESHA DARNELL JONES, TAKISHA A. TERRELL, KATHLEEN CARRIGAN, JEFFREY KATZ, Dr., LINDA REYNOLDS and WILLIAM L. CARON |
| 23-15545 |
| April 13, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (RAP, PJW and DJF) [12718170] (JFF) [Entered: 05/18/2023 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, PAUL J. WATFORD and DANIELLE J. FORREST): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the March 7, 2023 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. No further filings will be considered in this appeal 23-15545. DISMISSED. [12703271] (AF) [Entered: 04/26/2023 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 Copy of letter received. [12702271] (JFF) [Entered: 04/25/2023 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Lawrence Morelock response to motion or court order. Deficiencies: None. [12702255] (JFF) [Entered: 04/25/2023 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lawrence Morelock opening brief due 06/14/2023. [12695139] (RT) [Entered: 04/13/2023 12:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
